My Advice to Husbands on the Topic of Counseling…GO!

by Rhett Smith on September 1, 2010

If your wife EVER…I mean EVER, suggests to you, that you, or that the two of you should seek counseling.

GO!

“Couples don’t run to therapy at the first sign of trouble. Researchers estimate it often takes 5 to 7 yrs for some to seek help.” Marriage and Family/Sex Therapist David Schnarch

I find Schnarch’s comments to be so true. I would estimate that the average couple I work with end up in therapy about 2-3 years after the wife had initially suggested therapy. And it’s often not until the bottom completely falls out that the husband usually agrees to attend therapy.

The resulting feeling from the wife at this point has usually been one of resentment and anger….wondering “Why did it have to get to this point before he decided to come to counseling?” Or, “You all of a sudden agree to come to therapy, make all these changes…and I’m supposed to believe they are authentic. I’m supposed to all of a sudden overlook the last 2-3 years of me prodding you to come to counseling with me?”

Think what would happen that if at the first sign of relationship trouble a husband agrees to seek therapy with his wife. Think of all the problems and conflicts that can be addressed rather than letting…3, 4, 5 6, 7 years go by. What if a husband initiated professional help, rather than waiting for the wife to do it.

Any thoughts on why husbands are often so slow to seek professional help for their marriages?

{ 3 comments }

“I don’t really enjoy being a pastor’s wife. Joanie”
Permission to Speak Freely by Anne Jackson (pp. 16)

That “confession” from one of Anne’s readers, early on in her new book really stuck out to me.

There has been lots of research on this topic, and even more anecdotal evidence. And as a former full-time pastor, now part-time pastor, pastor’s kid, (and talking to my wife about this topic a lot) I think I know something of this subject and the expectations upon pastor’s spouses. Though there are plenty of men who are spouses to pastors, the most common scenario is the husband who is pastor.

There are stats such as these (found here).

August 1998, excerpts from James Dobson’s newsletter:
Our surveys indicated that 80 percent of pastors and 84 percent of their spouses are discouraged or are dealing with depression.

1991 Survey of Pastors (Fuller Institute of Church Growth)
80% believed pastoral ministry affected their families negatively
33% believed ministry was a hazard to their family

Leadership, Fall 1992 Marriage Problems Pastors Face
81% insufficient time together
71% use of money
70% income level
64% communication difficulties
63% congregational differences
57% differences over leisure activities
53% difficulties in raising children
46% sexual problems
41% Pastor’s anger toward spouse
35% differences over ministry career
25% differences over spouse’s career

And on and on and on….

Joanie’s statement in Anne’s book is done as a confession. I wonder if Joanie is her real name or not.

Because what I have found in my 12 plus years as a pastor, and my current work as a therapist, is that many spouses of pastors live in fear to tell their spouse (often their husband) how unhappy they are with their marriage (often blaming it on the spouse’s vocation), and experience anxiety due to the unrealistic expectations of being married to a pastor — expectations that are often placed on them by the congregation and reinforced by their spouse. This situation sets up a scenario for a lot of marital discord, but discord that often rarely sees the light of day in any constructive manner.

I remember sitting in one of my classes at Fuller Seminary on marriage counseling where the professor talked about a large study they had done on marital satisfaction with clergy couples. Each partner in the marriage rated their satisfaction. When the results came back, the one who was the pastor (usually the husband), significantly rated the marriage more satisfying than their spouse. The results highlighted the disconnect.

So, if you are a pastor, what do you actively do to open up communication in your marriage? Do you seek to better understand your spouse’s feelings about your role? Do you work on actively changing expectations to improve the life of your spouse and the marital satisfaction you both experience? Is your spouse first in your life, or is the church?

And if you are friend to a pastor’s spouse, have you actively sought ways that you can come alongside of them and help them through any difficult things they may be experiencing as a result of many of the unhealthy expectations placed upon them?

What can church communities do to better come alongside pastors and their spouses and help them in their marriages?

{ 0 comments }

The ubiquitous barrage of battery-powered stimuli delivered by phones, computers, and games makes “the chaos of constant connection” an addictive electronic narcotic. As continuous stimulation becomes the new normal, “gaps between moments of heightened stimulation” are disappearing; amusement “has squeezed the boredom out of life.” For the hyperstimulated, “the synaptic mindscape of daily life” becomes all peaks and no valleys.

That quote comes from an article by George Will that my dad emailed to me over the weekend, Boredom and the Costs of Constant Connection. If you haven’t already read the article, I highly suggest that you do.

Will’s article is just the latest in an onslaught of data that has been streaming forth over the last few months talking about the hazards of being continually “plugged in.” It’s obviously a very important topic to me as I have spent the last two posts addressing issues of identity and boundaries in a culture that constantly feels the need to be plugged in, Is Your True Sense Of Self And Identity At Risk As You Navigate An Online World? and Setting Boundaries With Technology Can Help You Maintain Your Sense Of Self And Identity.

If you set boundaries, or keep yourself from continually being plugged in, you will be swimming upstream in this culture it seems. Very few people encourage it, and I think even fewer take the time to thoughtfully reflect on how their constant need for stimulation is impacting them.

The article spends a lot of time talking about the impact constant contact with technology has on adolescent boys, often carrying over to men in adulthood. I concur with the findings as here are three very common findings on find in my own therapy practice.

  1. Men who continue to carry over into adulthood from adolescence their addiction, or high volume usage of video games.  Not only does the time it take to play the games often take the form of neglect in their marriages, family, and friendships, but these men tend to lack some of the social skills and boundary setting of their counterparts. Some guys will wait longer in line for the release of a new video game than they will talking to their wife that week.
  2. Boys whose parents continue to search for a cure for their ADHD and ADD in the form of meds, but do little to help restrict or boundary their kid’s use of technological stimulants.

    Cox doubts it is a mere coincidence that “the stratospheric increase in diagnosed learning and attention deficits” has correlated with “the advent of the electronic playground.” When so many Americans meet the diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, it “is arguably no longer a disorder at all—it’s just the way we are.”

  3. Couples who come into therapy and are bored with their marriage, yet seek comfort, affirmation, encouragement through the use of technology (FB, text, blog, Twitter, etc), rather than doing the hard work of putting restrictions on their technological use and putting effort into face to face time with their partner.

If you are wondering whether or not your need to constantly look at your phone, play video games, and surf the web is impacting you, I leave you with this statement…..wow!

“Unlike reading and listening to stories,” Cox warns, “the blitz of electronica doesn’t build deeper listening skills or a greater range of emotional expression.” Self-absorption, particularly among young males, may be the greatest danger of immersion in the bath of digital amusement: “Not only does withdrawal into electronica enable them to bypass the confusion and pain of trying to give their emotions some coherence, it also helps them avoid the realities of being a flawed, vulnerable, ordinary human being.” So “the silent, sullen boy at the mall’s game store may be next in line for an underemployed, lonely adulthood if we don’t teach him how to maintain effective social contacts with others.”

{ 5 comments }

Last week I shared with you some of my thoughts from my talk at the ECHO Conference. In the post, Is Your True Sense of Self And Identity At Risk As You Navigate An Online World I explored more in depth some of the technological hindrances to self and identity in an online world…so today I want to discuss some basic boundaries you can set with the technology in your life that can help you better maintain your sense of self.

Boundaries
Boundaries are important in all areas of our lives, and they are often not easy things to put into place. Anytime we put a boundary into place with someone (spouse, friend, family, boss) it is more than likely that we will receive some resistance from them. Boundaries are healthy markers that help us understand where we begin and end in relationship with people and things, and without them, we can slowly lose our sense of self in those people and things who prefer to live without boundaries. Boundaries can keep us from being suffocated, swallowed up, or absorbed by other personalities. They help us maintain our identity.

But boundaries don’t begin and end with people, but can and should be applied to things that we use, such as technological tools. If we don’t, we can be suffocated by them as well.

Boundaries are also hard work. You just don’t place a boundary and then sit back and watch it work. Boundaries take constant vigilance, maintenance and perseverance. So don’t expect to begin these boundaries with the technology in your life and expect miracles. They will take hard, daily work to keep them in place. But I promise, once you maintain them, you will see the results in your life.

Boundary Suggestions
Let me now suggest to you some boundaries that I think are helpful. These are boundaries that I have experimented with myself and continue to use. And they are ones that others have found beneficial in their own lives.

  1. Time Limits: Bottom line…you should have a time limit with the amount of time you spend online on your computer, the amount of time you play with your phone, etc.  If you don’t have time limits in place, you can easily get consumed by the technology.  Placing time limits on technology allows you to be in control, and not the other way around.  If you can’t place time limits, then I would say, you probably have some form of addiction to technology.  There are various tools (web apps) that can help you do this, as well as you have the ability to control time limits from your computer server.  Some people say to me, “I work with computers all day, I can’t be offline?”  My response is usually, “Really?  You can’t ever be offline at all?  If that’s the case, then there are other problems.”  You should still be able to set time limits.
  2. Physical (Basket, Car, Closet, etc.): Find some physical thing such as a basket, your car, or a closet to put all of your technological items in at some point in the day.  The physical place is a reminder to set your stuff aside.  It not only reminds you, but it reminds your family as well.  It also serves as a symbol to you, your family, etc, that they are more important than the technology that so often gets in the way of relationships.  They can look over at the basket and be reminded of a family’s priorities.  You can do this various ways, but what works well for me is that we have a tray that I put my phone and computer and other tech items in every night when I walk in the door.  Those items remain in that tray unless I may need them for some reason, but it has to be a good reason…not just browsing or killing time.  One family I know has everyone put their laptops and phones in their basket every night at 9pm, and no one can access the basket till 8am the next morning.  John Dyer has a good post about this, Why You Need A Technology Basket At Home.
  3. Tech Sabbath (Various Rhythms): I am always reminded that God created the earth in six days and then rested on the seventh day.  There was a rhythm of work and rest in his life, yet we seldom feel the need to model this example, instead working or being plugged in all seven days.  I think that an important boundary people can set in relation to their technology is a sabbath.  One day a week…Five to six days a month…Two to three weeks a year…where you are unplugged.  A sabbath is a reminder to us that our life is not dictated by work or technology, but that it is a life given unto God, rather than the tools we use.  I believe everyone should have at least one day a week where they don’t get online, check email, Twitter, FB, blog, etc, etc.  Most people can do this.  It’s rare that you have to/must check email everyday.  Often the inability to unplug from email one day a week says something more about your inability to create healthy boundaries, than it does about the reality of people not really needing you immediately, and as badly as you think.  Experiment with different rhythms, but setting time aside to be unplugged is not only restorative for you, but a great model to your family.  It reminds them of who is the most important…them, not the technology.
  4. Ask Others (Galatians 5:22-23): My favorite professor in seminary said to our class one day, “If you really want to know if I’m someone who lives out the fruit of the spirit that Paul talks about in Galatians, then ask my family who lives with me everyday…don’t take my word for it.”  We often have a false sense of reality.  I may think that I’m good with establishing boundaries with my technology, but that may not really be the case.  The people who would really know would be my wife, my friends, my children, my co-workers, etc.  Go to your spouse, friend, etc. and ask them, “Give me an honest assessment about my use of technology.  Do I have healthy boundaries?  Am I on my phone too much?  Does my use of technology get in the way of our relationship?”  Don’t take your word for it.  Ask others.
  5. Strive for Face to Face: When at all possible, strive to meet with people face to face.  If you can talk face to face, rather than text…do that.  If you can sit down over coffee, rather than email, then do that.  Anytime we have the opportunity to meet face to face, take the opportunity.  You can read about my attempts in 2009 to take my online community offline, and in person.
  6. Experiment/Be Creative: You know your life, and your use of technology better than me.  So be creative and experiment with some different boundaries you can establish.

The better able we are to establish healthy boundaries with our technology, the better able we are to be ourselves, and maintain our identities in a world that is asking us to surrender it to all the latest technology.

What are some boundaries you have established with your technology?  What area are you struggling in the most when it comes to setting healthy boundaries with your technology?

{ 4 comments }

Last week I had the opportunity to speak at the ECHO Conference in Dallas for the first time, and for my topic I decided to address an issue that I have been wrestling with for quite some time — Not Losing Yourself in Social Media. It’s a topic that has been near and dear to my heart as I have continually struggled to maintain my sense of self and identity in an online world. I know that If I’m not careful I can easily get caught up in the online identities that I construct for myself, or that I allow for others to distort/enhance/exaggerate for me.

There were lots of different aspects of this idea that I shared with the audience, but I wanted to share a portion of it with you today.

I want to begin with some of the online challenges to maintaining our identity, and in the next post I will follow up with some boundaries that we can implement that may be helpful for you in maintaining your identity and fostering your sense of self.

Longing for Face to Face
I love Paul’s words in I Corinthians 13:12, “Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully. Even as I am fully known.” We have this longing desire to see others face to face, and to be fully known by others. For now that desire is distorted as we only get a poor glimmer of who we are. But we are longing really to be seen for who we are — for others to love us and accept in everything that they see.

But the dilemma for many in a technological driven culture is that instead of in person, face to face relational contact, we often settle for a cheaper version of it. We often would rather limit our face to face through a technological tool, often with social media acting as the medium. We would rather email, chat, text, tweet and use Apple’s Face to Face, then to have the real encounter.  We believe that the version we can construct of ourselves through technology is better, or maybe more likable to others.  In the exchange we slowly begin the process of losing our true self.

The problem is that our best opportunity for really being known, for really allowing others to see us “face to face” is when we are in direct, unmediated relation with one another. I love the declaration of Adam in Genesis 2:23 when he at last declares that he has found “bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh.” It’s in Adam’s encounter with the other that he moves from “earth creature” to “man.” Adam becomes himself.

It is in our encounter with others in our lives, unmediated by technology, that I believe we have the fullest opportunity to become, and to be ourselves. To claim our true self that God created, and live out our identity in Christ.

The Technological Hindrances to Identity and Self
There is lots of literature on the topic of technology and its influence on identity, and I believe that even more is being written as we begin to see more readily the effects of its use on our daily lives.  Both the intended and unintended consequences.  But four theories that I have read up on and that I think are helpful in understanding the challenges that technology can pose to our identity come from the following:

  1. Albert Borgmann’s “device paradigm” which stems from his 1964 work, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life (HT: to John Dyer for introducing me to this).  A device is a technological process available at the press of a button.  Because of this we often don’t see the processes being performed.  As it gets more and more complex it begins to compress the process.  For example, picking a burger up at fast food has compressed the process/relationship that used to exist in making/getting/eating a burger.  This process happens to relationships as well.  Technological processes like a follow/unfollow on Twitter, or a like/unlike on Facebook compresses relationships.  Without the process, and the interaction with the other, we begin to lose our sense of self.


  2. Kenneth Gergen’s “saturated self” which derives from his 1991 book, The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. In short, Gergen states that in the formation of relationships we often use mediating technologies (i.e. cell phones, internet, computer based applications, etc.) — and if we lack an inner core/identity, then we experience what he calls multiphrenia (identities that are shaped/formed by too many choices of self expression).  Ultimately that process gives us what Gergen calls the “saturated self” which is when our self exists as a collection of external images (i.e. online profiles, platforms, flickr images, avatars, blog logos, etc.).

  3. Andrew F. Wood’s and Michael J. Smith’s “mediated self” which comes from their 2004 book, Online Communication: Linking Technology, Identity, and Culture.  In the book they say “the ‘mediated self’ constructs a sense of ‘who I am,’ through interaction with others through various media.” Simply, you construct your sense of identity through the lens of the media you use (blog, Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, FourSquare, etc.)

  4. David Schnarch’s “reflected sense of self” from his book, Passionate Marriage: Keeping Love and Intimacy Alive in Committed Relationships. In his book he says “When we have little differentiation our identity is constructed out of what’s called a ‘reflected sense of self’. We need continual contact, validation, and consensus (or disagreement) from others. This leaves us unable to maintain a clear sense of who we are in shifting or uncertain circumstances. We develop a contingent identity based on a ‘self-in-relationship.’” This “reflected sense of self” is often what drives one partner into an affair, because they like and desire the “reflected sense of self” the affair partner reflects back to them, then the reality that the spouse presents.  This can happen in social media very easily as we often hop online, liking our “reflected sense of self” we receive from the online identities we have constructed and the adoration that they receive from others.  Many choose to have an affair with their online life and social media world, at the expense of their spouse and family.

As you look at just four of the theories that can present challenges to us living out of our true selves in an online world, do any of them resonate with you?  Do you see yourself struggling with any particular issue?

Stay tuned for the next post when I will talk about some of the boundaries that you can implement in your own life to help you stay grounded as you navigate the online world.

{ 6 comments }

This last week my wife gave birth to our second child, a baby boy. The birth of a child is an amazing event, but I am hard pressed to find an event that better brings to focus one’s limitations in life, quickly eliminating many choices and options, but therefore bringing better clarity and focus to one’s life as well.

We live in a culture that says you can do anything and everything you want to do…the choices and possibilities are endless. But I suggest that that is simply not true. There are limits to what we can do and achieve, no matter what are ambition or drive is. Many see this as a hindrance, but I see it as freedom.

Sometimes having limited options and choices is true freedom because it clarifies things. Helps a person focus on something more intently, rather than always playing around with what option or choice to make.

This is experienced by humans in all stages of life, but I especially see this struggle with young adults, primarily those who are making that transition from college into the “real world”/”working world.” There are often so many choices and options before them that they quickly become anxious and paralyzed, for out of fear of making the wrong choice.

In recent years a couple of interesting books have hit the shelves that talk about this dilemma, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less, and The Tyranny of Choice (just to name two).


Americans today choose among more options in more parts of life than has ever been possible before. To an extent, the opportunity to choose enhances our lives. It is only logical to think that if some choice is good, more is better; people who care about having infinite options will benefit from them, and those who do not can always just ignore the 273 versions of cereal they have never tried. Yet recent research strongly suggests that, psychologically, this assumption is wrong. Although some choice is undoubtedly better than none, more is not always better than less.

In April I wrote the post Restlessness: Not Acknowledging Our Limits Can Keep Us From Focusing on Anything Permanent, and in February of 2007 I wrote, Vocation and Identity: Part 3-Limitations and Possibilities — in these posts I try to explore the varying aspects of choices and limits.

Parker Palmer puts it best in the book Let Your Life Speak: Listening for the Voice of Vocation

“Everything in the universe has a nature, which means limits as well as potentials, a truth well known by people who work daily with the things of the world. Making pottery, for example, involves more than telling the clay what to become. The clay presses back on the potter’s hands, telling her what it can and cannot do–and if she fails to listen, the outcome will be both frail and ungainly. Engineering involves more than telling materials what they must do. If the engineer does not honor the nature of the steel or the wood or the stone, his failure will go beyond aesthetics: the bridge or the building will collapse and put human life in peril.

The human self also has a nature, limits as well as potentials. If you seek vocation without understanding the material you are working with, what you build with your life will be ungainly and may well put lives in peril, your own and some of those around you. “Faking it” in the service of high values is no virtue and has nothing to do with vocation. It is an ignorant, sometimes arrogant, attempt to override one’s nature, and it will always fail.

Our deepest calling is to grow into our own authentic selfhood, whether or not it conforms to some image of who we ought to be. As we do so, we will not only find the joy that every human being seeks–we will also find our path of authentic service in the world. True vocation joins self and service, as Frederick Buechner asserts when he defines vocation as ‘the place where your deep gladness meets the world’s deep need.’” (Let Your Life Speak: Listening for the Voice of Vocation by Parker Palmer, pp. 15-16)

Part of being human is accepting our limits along with our potential, and living within that tension. With each new transition in life I have had to wrestle with the number of possibilities available to me and make some choices, choices that limit other things that could have been. With every YES that I declare, a NO is declared as well. Meaning when we say YES to something, we automatically say NO to something else. Many people cannot accept this, constantly believing they can do everything…often leading to burnout, depression, workaholic mentality, etc.

When my son was born last week I automatically realized that there were some things on my plate that I could no longer attend to or attempt. I was faced with an ever increasing limiting of time with a growing family. But instead of seeing that as a hindrance, I realized what a beautiful thing it is when something like a family can help one place limitations on their life, and by doing so bringer sharper clarity to what is truly important, and to what truly needs attending to. It is a gift.

Now that I have cleared my plate of many things, the things that do remain can be focused on with more intensity and purpose than ever before. These are my limits, and with these limits comes a freedom that no longer leaves me treading water in a sea of options, fearful that I might make the wrong choice, or limit myself to all the other possibilities.

{ 3 comments }

Striving for a healthy, thriving marriage–and simply trying to avoid divorce are two very different goals for therapy.

One is proactive and the other is reactive.

I’ve noticed that the proactive group is often quicker to get professional help for their marriage than the latter group.  The reactive group often finds themselves in the counseling office as a last resort.

Being proactive–being intentional about your marriage makes all the difference in the world.

I have been asked quite frequently recently, “When should a couple go to counseling?  What are some warning signs that we should seek professional help?”

As I have thought about this question I have come up with a few suggestions (some based on my own experience as a married person and on my experience as a therapist; and some based on other professional’s advice). Here are ten reasons when a couple should go seek professional counseling help. There are many more, but this is a start:

  1. Do premarital counseling.  If you are married and you didn’t do this, well, it’s water under the bridge.  But if you aren’t married at this point, I would highly recommend this as good premarital counseling can help couples bring issues to awareness that are often avoided, and can help equip couples to work through the conflict.
  2. Go to counseling when there aren’t any issues/As an opportunity for growth. In reality there are always issues that we can address in our marriages, but it’s better to seek help before issues gain a stronghold in your marriage.  See counseling as an opportunity to learn and grow, rather than a place to try and fix.
  3. When the Four Horsemen make an appearance (Criticism, Contempt, Defensiveness, Stonewalling). Marriage researcher John Gottman talks about the Four Horsemen at length in his book The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work.  Gottman talks about these as being predictors of divorce in couples, and so it is best to get help before any of these become habitual in your marriage.
  4. When you notice resentment towards your partner. Resentment is one of those feelings that if not dealt with quickly can slowly, but surely creep into your relationship and become a cancer.
  5. When you are experiencing a major life transition. Life transitions such as marriage, birth of children, loss of loved one, beginning/loss of a vocation can bring about all kinds of emotions and challenges.  It can be helpful to have someone help you sort through these things.
  6. Barriers to communication. At various points in our relationships certain barriers arise that inhibit effective verbal communication.  I say verbal, because the reality is, we are always communicating to one another.  Having a professional help you work through the barriers to effectively communicating is a great reason to seek help.
  7. Lack of intimacy in the relationship. There are various kinds of intimacy in a relationship (see previous post), but if you notice a tapering off, or absence of intimacy in the relationship, it can be advantageous to have someone help you work through the problem.
  8. Focus is taken off of marriage and placed onto other things (i.e. vocation, children, friends, etc.). Anytime a couple moves their focus away from working on and having a strong and healthy marriage, other aspects of their lives suffer.  Lots of couples become so focused on other things that the marriage begins to deteriorate.
  9. When you become too busy. Lots of couples make the excuse of busyness as a reason to not be able to come into counseling.  When you become too busy to work on your marriage, then you know you have a problem.
  10. Whenever your partner suggests you do marriage counseling. Lots and lots of therapist’s offices are filled with couples where one suggested counseling 2-3 years ago, but the other partner resisted or thought it was not necessary.  Now they are in counseling because the partner who initiated it years ago has had enough and is ready to leave.  Don’t wait that long.

What reasons would you suggest for when a couple should seek professional counseling help?

{ 3 comments }

It is more than likely that when you ask someone about intimacy, only 2-3 types of intimacy are discussed…3 is pushing it for many people. People talk about physical/sexual intimacy, emotional intimacy, and I often hear about spiritual intimacy a lot as well. When intimacy is only focused on these 2-3 types it can be overwhelming for a relationship, putting lots of pressure on 1-2 types, while ignoring all the other types of intimacy that is available to a couple.

What happens if your emotional or sexual intimacy is not firing on all cylinders at the moment in your relationship? Does that mean that you don’t share intimacy with one another? Or that you can’t look towards other types of intimacy while you are not connecting in other areas?

When I’m working with couples I often like to give them a handout that talks about the varying types of intimacy that can be present in a relationship, while taking a look at what some of the barriers to that intimacy may be. (This is a handout that was passed down to me in training, and there is no data on it in regards to the resource or book it came from. So if you know the source, let me know.) Couples love having something tangible to look at and discuss when it comes to intimacy. It often gives them a sense of relief knowing that there are many types of intimacy available in a relationship, and it often gives them goals and action steps to strive towards in their intimate connections with one another.

Here is the following list of the types of intimacy, along with some common blocks:

12 Types of Intimacy

  1. Sexual Intimacy: Sharing passion and physical pleasuring
  2. Emotional Intimacy: Being tuned to each other’s wavelength
  3. Intellectual Intimacy: Closeness in the world of ideas
  4. Aesthetic Intimacy: Sharing experience of beauty
  5. Creative Intimacy: Sharing in acts of creating together
  6. Recreational Intimacy: Relating in experiences of fun and play
  7. Work Intimacy: Closeness of sharing common tasks
  8. Crisis Intimacy: Closeness in coping with problems and pain
  9. Conflict Intimacy: Facing and struggling with differences
  10. Commitment Intimacy: Mutually derived from common self-interest
  11. Spiritual Intimacy: Unity shared in religious expression
  12. Communication Intimacy: Mutual understanding and affirmation

Blocks to Intimacy

  1. Expecting feelings of intimacy to just happen
  2. Blaming each other when it doesn’t happen
  3. Superficial Communication
  4. Devoting most of time and energy to job, children, home, career, etc.
  5. Too much togetherness–smothering
  6. Withdrawing affirmation, caring behavior, support
  7. Not Using Platinum Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you

If you sat down with your partner, took a look at the types of intimacy, how many types do you think you and your partner would agree that you connect on?

What are the common barriers to intimacy in your relationship?

{ 4 comments }

I feel like I do some of my best thinking and reflecting while out on a run. And while I was running yesterday a few stanzas from the Coldplay song, What If? really stuck out to me…

What if you should decide
That you don’t want me there by your side
That you don’t want me there in your life

Ooh ooh-ooh, that’s right
Let’s take a breath, jump over the side
Ooh ooh-ooh, that’s right
How can you know it, if you don’t even try
Ooh ooh-ooh, that’s right

Every step that you take
Could be your biggest mistake
It could bend or it could break
That’s the risk that you take (Coldplay, What If?)

The song stuck out to me for several reasons…

  1. There is a great amount of relational anxiety in the relationship being described.  The artist doesn’t know if the person will be there by their side…it’s an option the other person has, completely out of the control of the other.  The artist doesn’t know if they will “bend or break”…and there is an element of risk involved.  The risk involves anxiety, but to not push through the anxiety may forfeit the opportunity for the relationship and for growth.
  2. As people we love the words and songs of poets and artists.  We love the songs about relationships, especially ones that involve an element of risk and not knowing.  We wonder, “Will that person be there on the other side” in the romance movies we watch and the songs that we sing.  BUT, we don’t like to have this experience ourselves.  It’s all fine and dandy to sing about and to watch on the silver screen, but when it comes to taking these risks and venturing forth through the anxiety in our own relationships, we often choose to sit on the sidelines, seeking comfort and security.
  3. This is the predicament of all relationships.  At some point you will have a choice before you…two options (marriage and sex therapist David Schnarch refers to it as Two-Choice Dillemas).  Do you stay in the place of comfort and safety which is actually a threat to your relationship, or do you venture out into the unknown, facing the anxiety, hoping for growth in the relationship.

These reasons make us all ask “What If? in our relationships, our families, our faith, our vocations and more.

I love how David Schnarch puts it:

How do you find the trust to go “exploring” with your spouse? Many couples think it’s based on safety and security, which means staying in the comfort cycle. Trust can be based on a pact you’ll never leave the inner circle (comfort/safety), or developed from a trip through the growth cycle. But the trust that results is totally different: before you’ve ventured into the outer circle (growth), trust is based on blind faith. It lacks the safety and security of knowing how you’ll do when “what if” happens; it is an uneasy trust, an untested trust. What’s actually required is the leaf of faith, because real safety follows rather than precedes your first trip through the growth cycle. Trust based on shared mutual experience and hardship–watching what your partner and you do under pressure and adversity–is solid and resilient. (Passionate Marriage, David Schnarch)

So hold onto yourself, face your anxiety and take the leap knowing that if you don’t, then you may also forfeit any opportunities for relational and spiritual growth.

Anxiety is the dizziness of freedom, which emerges when the spirit wants to posit the synthesis and freedom looks down into possibility, laying hold of finiteness to support itself. Freedom succumbs in this dizziness. Further than this, psychology cannot and will not go. In that very moment everything is changed, and freedom, when it again rises, sees that it is guilty. Between these two moments lies the leap, which no science has explained and which no science will explain. (The Concept of Anxiety by Soren Kierkegaard)

{ 5 comments }

Boundaries, Boundaries, Boundaries…Boundaries

by Rhett Smith on June 11, 2010


“Without truth there can be no intimacy, because without truth you wind up sharing lies or delusions. Without intimacy there can be no relationship. When two partners share their true selves, protecting self and others by the correct practice of boundaries, the miracle of spirituality is present.” (The Intimacy Factor, pp. xvi)

Those words are from Pia Mellody, renowned clinician in the area of codependency and boundaries in relationships, childhood trauma, and many, many other things. I had the chance to see her speak last week and was so blown away by her three hour presentation, Coming into Balance: Addressing Issues of Value, Power and Abundance….that I still can’t stop thinking about it.

If you are looking for a wonderful book to read, I recommend, The Intimacy Factor: The Ground Rules for Overcoming the Obstacles to Truth, Respect, and Lasting Love

“Without boundaries, there is no relationship. Without relationship there is no intimacy. Without intimacy there is no love, and without love the spiritual path is hidden from us.

Boundaries create the experience of truth and respect in which love can grow. We recognize that our inherent worth cannot be taken away from us by the display of our authentic selves. We are human and only that. We are born with inherent worth and it coexists with all our human flaws. (The Intimacy Factor, pp. 118)

{ 1 comment }