Tag Archive - relationships

Relational Tweeting

twitter_logo_headerFor those of you that read my other writings online, you know that I love Twitter. I think it’s an absolutely amazing tool that I think has the ability to help us connect with others in some meaningful ways.



And Twitter is not just about connecting online, but it’s about connecting offline.



Twitter can be a great catalyst for enhancing present relationships, and that’s why I highly recommend that you read Simple Marriage’s blog post How Twitter May Tweak Your Relationships. They do a great job of really capturing some unique ways that Twitter can “tweak” your relationships in a great way.

  1. Focus on what’s important.
  2. Stay connected throughout the day.
  3. Team parenting as a way to grow closer.
  4. Collaborate with other parent’s/couples.

Great post, so go over and check it out, and hopefully you will check out the Simple Marriage blog more often as they post great stuff.

Step Into Your Anxiety If You Want To Grow

21dpppnebcl_sl500_aa160_Recently I have been listening to the audio version of the David Snarch’s book Passionate Marriage: Sex, Love, and Intimacy in Emotionally-Committed Relationships.

One of the things that he says in the lecture is (and I’m restating in my own words):

That in order for a person to grow, they must step into their anxiety.  That it is in confronting our anxiety, rather than seeking comfort and security that we achieve growth as a person.

Last week I asked the question, “What Keeps You Centered?”, wondering what it is that helps keep you grounded/centered/balanced when dealing with anxiety…knowing that we all deal with anxiety and stress in our lives.

But a different question is:

Do you step into your anxiety?

Do you try things that stir up your anxiety in order for you to grow?

Or do you seek comfort and security, rather than risk the realities of facing your anxiety?

Share:

  1. Share a time when you stepped into your anxiety, knowing it was an opportunity for growth?
  2. What were you feeling and thinking at the time?
  3. Did you see it as an opportunity for growth, or just something you know you should do?

Though Snarch is looking at stepping into one’s anxiety in the context of marriage, sex and family, it can be said that for any of us to grow we must do the same.

There is more to be said on this issue and where Snarch is going with this topic, but for now, I will leave it at this.

Affirmation: One of Technology’s Negative Effects on Your Marriage and Family

jleMcLuhan and Twitter via John Dyer
This is a post I have had in the making for a while, but when I read John Dyer’s post Tools for Tech Thinking: McLuhan on Twitter, and well, he unknowingly gave me some inspiration to post some of my thoughts on this issue.

Read John’s post for some context, but essentially Marshall McLuhan in his seminal work The Medium is the Message poses four questions about media/technology:

  1. What does it (the medium or technology extend)?
  2. What does it make obsolete?
  3. What is retrieved?
  4. “What does the technology reverse into if it is over-extended?

John does a great job of summarizing what these four things are, but for this post I’m concerned about question four, “What does the technology reverse into if it is over-extended?” John explicates the question in this way:

What does Twitter reverse into if it is over-extended?

This is McLuhan’s “negative” question where he gives examples like the ability to project one’s voice is lost if the microphone is overused and the ability to walk long distances is lost when one relies on vehicles.

  • Twitter can connect physically distant individuals, but when overused it can also isolate a person from those who are physically near (like spouses) reversing into a state of more disconnectedness.
  • Twitter can also reverse into a level of shallowness, because communication is limited to 140 characters.
  • Twitter can also reverse into a mess of noise and distraction since so many voices are speaking  at the same time.

Technology and Affirmation
Most of us may not realize it, but technology is often a major source of affirmation for us in our lives. John is speaking of Twitter, but Twitter is not the only culprit. Name it: Facebook, blogs, mommy forums, fantasy leagues, chat, MySpace, email, Blackberry’s i-Phones, etc, etc.

We go to these sites and belong to these online communities because in some shape, form or fashion we are affirmed in them. People accept us, care for us, are there for us. It soon becomes an instant source of affirmation.

Continue Reading…

Innovation3 Gathering–Live Blog by Rhett Smith (Tuesday & Wednesday)

I’m very excited to be a part of the live blogging team for the Innovation3 Gathering, put on by Leadership Network, and hosted by Bent Tree Bible Fellowship.

I hope that you can join me on my blog Tuesday and Wednesday as I will live blog 4 specific sessions, and as much of the rest of the event that I can. I hope to see your input and comments throughout the day (via this blog and Twitter–please use the #i3 hashtag), and if you have any questions you would like me to pose the speakers in or out of their sessions, please let me know. You can reach me via the live blog or on Twitter @rhetter.

If you are having trouble viewing this live blog, try watching it in a pop-up window: Click Here

Not only can YOU participate, but the tweets of 11 other Twitterers will post automatically to the live blog. So stay tuned for their behind the scenes insight and thoughts: gregatkinson, cynthiaware, djchuang, scottmcclellan, decart, lancebauslaugh, camron_ware, flowerdust, innovation3, tonymorganlive and mbstockdale.

Connect In Other Ways

Innovation3 Twitter Announcements @innovation3

Innovation3 Twitter Hashtag #i3

Innovation3 Website

Innovation3 Blog

Innovation3 Flickr Photostream

Innovation3 Bloggers Meetup/Tweetup

See you there in person or online….

My Blog Confession: How An Unfortunate Post I Wrote on John Piper 3 Years Ago Has Changed the Way I Blog

Apologies
John Saddington over at Church Crunch had a great post, Digital Apologies and Blog Confessionals. John’s post was in reference to Digg co-founder Kevin Rose’s apology about comments on his uber-popular video podcast Diggnation. John says:

Blogging, for most part and for many is a one-way street. It’s a digital megaphone to the public. It’s a personal soapbox and a electronic pulpit. It’s a place where apologies aren’t required.

But that’s if you hold the aforementioned definition of “blogging” to be true.

And for some, it is. For others, like myself, blogging is about relationships. You see, I’m more interested in using my blogs to build relationships with other people instead of making sure that my own voice can be heard in the blogospheric galaxy.

And just like in real relationships, things get tough: Feelings get hurt, things get twisted and go all Robbie Williams on you (read: “Misunderstood“). People get passionate and emotional, people get upset and say things they don’t really mean, people sin.

All this means is that people have to learn to apologize, and do it on their blog.

Passion & Blogging, Like Oil & Water…Often Don’t Mix Well
People are passionate and blogging is instantaneous. Mix the two together and you sometimes wish you could take back what you write. I have been blogging for over 4 years and it has taken me as long to be more cautious, careful and gracious when I post something, then say it did in the earlier years.

Blogging is often reactionary, and the quickest way to drive traffic to your site is to say something that can cause a reaction in others. Usually that is done by handling controversial issues, attacking popular figures in an industry/ministry, or by just plain and simple rabble rousing.

In the beginning that might seem fun as you engage a very passionate and rabble rousing crowd on your blog, but in the end, I don’t think that’s enough to sustain a life of blogging. Nor is it sufficient to bring joy into your blogging life. Nor does it often lead to positive change or transformation in the lives of those who read your blog, as well as yourself. It’s difficult to build relationships with those who you are constantly engaged in criticism, contempt and combative behavior with…assuming you want any type of relationship at all. But I think it’s the relationships that are formed, and when they are formed, it’s the synergy that is created online that can lead to long term positive change, not only for the web, but the worlds we inhabit and ultimately the Kingdom of God.

This Is My Confession
Almost 3 years ago I wrote one of those posts I wish I could take back. It wasn’t a post I wanted to take back because I didn’t believe in what I was saying (theologically), but rather it was more vitriolic than I would have liked coming from myself. And it was attackful on the person and character of John Piper, rather than just being in disagreement over views. I wrote it in a fit of passion (aka anger, hurt, sadness, grief, etc.) and published it instantly (Background: my mom, grandmother, aunt and some other loved ones of mine died of breast cancer–so a warning to us all to step back when topics become too emotionally engaging for us–that is not a good time to blog and publish instantly). I hesitate to even bring it up since it has been laid to rest, but John Saddington’s post is a good reminder of our continual need to not only make apologies and seek forgiveness with those in our personal lives, but with those lives we are in contact with online.

My original post was fueled by John Piper’s comments on his battle with cancer.

Whether you read my posts or not (and I sort of hope you don’t), you can see that an initial post written in a moment of passion and instant publishing turned into a total of four posts as things spiraled out of control, misunderstandings occurred, feelings were hurt, theologies attacked, and good people without the context of a relationship…misunderstood. In hindsight, I pretty much still hold to those same theological positions that I held then…but I wish I never would have posted that blog…or at least I wish I never would have posted it without being more gracious, or without first seeking to contact John Piper and have a conversation to gain more understanding. But I did post, and I didn’t do the latter. But hopefully 3 years later I am more mature and living and learning as I blog and as I forgive and am forgiven in the process.

Meeting Abraham Piper Made Things Real
A year and a half after that blog post I was contacted by a guy named Abraham Piper on Facebook. He was wanting to connect at GodblogCon ’07 in Las Vegas. When I saw that last name I was like, “Doh, can that possibly be…John Piper’s son?” And it was. I was nervous to meet him, knowing what I had said about his father. When we met, I nervously offered up my apology for speaking about his father in that way. He immediately said not to worry about it, and that it’s pretty much a waste of energy to hold a grudge or not be forgiving of those who have criticisms of you (those are my words, not his). And I got the impression that as John Piper’s son, he was probably used to his father receiving both praise and criticism.

We continued to hang out the next few days and have a really good time of engaging conversation with one another and those at the conference. What that encounter did was put a real context, real relationship, real human face on the person of John Piper…all through my encounter with his son. From that moment I vowed to do my best to think with more clarity and wisdom and grace before I posted negative stuff (criticisms, etc.) about another person, group of people, etc. I’ve tried and somedays I succeed and other days I fail. Hopefully I succeed on more of them.

But because of my relationship (albeit through his son Abraham) with John Piper, I am more understanding of what kind of quality man, and passionate Christian he is. Therefore, with the context of the relationship it’s much easier to be gracious in our disagreements, knowing that as followers of Christ we can be united in so much more than our theological differences. And with the context of a relationship, it’s much easier for us to humble ourselves and ask for and seek forgiveness.

So Let’s Be Congruent
This is where online meets real life…they go hand in hand, and they will continue to go more hand in hand as the web becomes a much larger part of our lives than it already is. This is where our online and offline worlds must become more congruent, and we must become more consistent as people in relationships with one another, and as followers in Christ.

So Abraham. I appreciate your kindness, graciousness and forgiveness. I don’t know if you ever read the posts (and I hope you didn’t, and still don’t–because I’m a different blogger now). And John, if you ever did read them, I apologize for the personal attacks…and though we land in different theological camps I appreciate your ministry, and the lives of the people that you impacted whom I’m in direct relationships with.

So What About You
Have you ever put your foot in your mouth, were less than kind, or wish you could take something back you wrote on your blog?

Please share what it was (if you want to), and how you handled it? Did you apologize? Confess? Seek the person out?

Blog on friends….

Searching for Intimacy Online and with Social Media Tools

Looking to Connect
It is no surprise to any of us that people are looking online to connect with others, and that in the process a certain level of intimate needs are met. Whether it’s a chat group, dating service, blog or class reunion site, people are finding connection.

The questions for you…the question for me…the question for us is: Are we getting our needs for intimacy online, rather than in the relationships that we are a part of (i.e. family, spouse, friends, etc.)? Do we spend more time feeding the relationships we are a part of in person, or the ones online?

I have the tendency to ramble (can be a gift, but often a curse), so let me break it down very simply.

When our need for intimacy and connection are not being met in our relationships, we often turn towards the place (most often another person; addiction; work, etc.) where we can connect, find intimacy. Ultimately, we not only want intimacy (and when I talk about intimacy, I am not speaking just sexually, but in general), but we want to feel valued for who we are, what we have to say, and what we have to offer. If then, the relationships we are in do not provide a place where we feel safe, valued, affirmed, loved….where we don’t connect and have a level of intimacy….WELL, then we often turn to other things.

Instant Affirmation
That’s what makes the internet, online communities and social media tools so powerful and addicting. Unlike the reality of a face to face relationship, online communities can often provide instant affirmation, and access to connection, and a certain level of intimacy that sometimes is harder to achieve when you are dealing with another person, in the flesh. Online we can be anyone we want to be…we can present ourselves in any shape, size or manner. It is easy to be liked, and if someone doesn’t like us, or affirm us, well then we can just remove them from our community or shut down communication. That is much more difficult to do in person.

What I’m trying to communicate is much more complex than what I can, or am wanting to achieve in this post. But I do want you…I do want me…I do want us to be more AWARE of this issue.

Let me give you a prime example. Let’s say you are a blogger (and most of us are) and you have developed an online following that is pretty affirming. They like what you write, they leave comments, your traffic is a boost to your ego. Well, because of that affirmation you turn to that channel to find that connection. And if you aren’t careful, you stop paying as much attention to your relationships (family, spouse, children, friends, etc.). You have this online community that is affirming and an instant connection…so when family life isn’t as quick to affirm or provide connection, it becomes an easy shift to start paying more attention to the online world.

The danger in all this is that it’s really a bind. People often seek affirmation from the online world life when their home/work life isn’t so great. And other times, just spending so much time online without any boundaries can lead to neglect of our in person relationships. And when they get difficult, it’s just easier to stay online.

Be Aware
As someone who is engaged in the world of social media, therapy and ministry I would just say for you to be aware…to take stock, assess a few things.  Ask some questions.

  • How much time am I spending online a day?  What does my time online take away from?
  • What kind of social activities or relationships am I getting involved in?  Something as innocent as searching for, befriending and communicating with old friends online may be an attempt to fill some need for connection you aren’t getting at home.
  • Are your in person relationships being neglected in favor of your online ones?
  • Are you getting your needs met for connection, affirmation, love, acceptance, intimacy, etc. online?
  • If you and your spouse/significant other aren’t connecting, are you taking the time to talk to each other about it, or do you withdraw and seek it somewhere else..in this case online?
  • At the end of the week (outside of your required online time needed for your job), when you tally up your time online in your freetime vs. the time you spend with your family, spouse, children, etc….which ends up being more?  Why do you think that is?
  • Does your online life affirming you in ways that you aren’t getting from your in person relationships?  Or has your time online taken you away from developing and working on those relationships in person, therefore they aren’t as fulfilling as the ones online?
  • Do you belong to an accountability group that not only keeps you accountable for other parts of your life, but your online life as well.


Resources
I want to just suggest and point out a couple of resources.  Some of these are more aimed towards the sexual intimacy that many seek for online, but I suggest them to you to just point out the larger issue…and that is this:  That our online behavior affects our relationships, and sometimes online community is easier than our in person relationships, just reinforcing our desire for quick affirmation that we seek online.  And now, many professional and lay communities are really starting to acknowledge how our technological lives impact not only us, but those we are in relationship with.

Just check out the current issue of the AAMFT Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. By browsing a list of some of the articles you can see the growing concern of how our online worlds, technological lives are impacting our relationships.

Cybersex and the E-teen: What Marriage and Family Therapists Should Know

Technology, Relationships, and Problems: A Research Synthesis

Emotional and Sexual Infidelity Offline and in Cyberspace
Cybersex: The Impact of a Contemporary Problem on the Practices of Marriage and Family Therapists

Therapists’ Assessment and Treatment of Internet Infidelity Cases
Assisting A Concerned Person to Motivate Someone Experiencing Cybersex Into Treatment : Application of Invitational Intervention: The ARISE Model to Cybersex

Also, check out the book, In the Shadows of the Net: Breaking Free from Complusive Online Sexual Behavior.

Plug….United Nerd LifeGroup
This is just one place where I’m learning a lot about the balance between living online, yet setting healthy boundaries in my online space, especially in regards to my family, relationships, work, etc. Join us tomorrow night for a great conversation at Tony Steward leads us in the below discussion.

When: 9:00–10:00PM Central Time

Where: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/tonystewards-show

Topic: We are heading into week 4 of our 6 week study on getting UnPlugged as we are all online and into technology. This week we are going to be talking about having healthy intimacy in our lives and relationships. There is nothing like the distraction of technology and information overload to kill our opportunities for intimacy.

Join the Facebook Group, United Nerd LifeGroup

Showing Skin at Church

I don’t know if this is an issue (too much skin) at your church, but it definitely is one at ours. I can’t tell you how many conversations there have been about this topic. Doesn’t matter how many times our pastor has talked about dress and modesty, it only seems to get worse.

And I don’t want to pick on women here, it’s just that men don’t usually show skin because women aren’t usually visually stimulated the same way men are.

But it’s definitely an issue and I’ve become more and more shocked by what young women are wearing, not only in church, but when I step out the door and head into public. I’ve thought on this issue before, but now that I have a baby daughter I’m thinking more about the issue of modesty and what my wife and I want to teach her as she grows up.

No matter what we as parents do I know there will always be that cultural peer pressure on my daughter to do something different. But in the midst of that pressure I hope that we can convey the message of the importance of modesty, and that showing skin is not what she should value or want approval from others for. Doesn’t get easier for parents when teen stars provide much of the cultural peer pressure (i.e. Hannah Montana).

And I know this is a difficult issue for men. A little skin on a woman can send a man’s thought process hurling into outer space and in a direction farthest from purity. So on the one hand a man might get excited and tempted by it, but it’s also the same thing that can destroy him or make him make decisions that he would otherwise not make. That’s power.

It’s a vicious cycle. Women are admired in our culture for their sexuality, but we as Christians are also trying to send a different message that doesn’t usually succeed.

I don’t know where we head on this issue in Church. But maybe it needs to be an open conversation between men and women where we can encourage each other to strive for lives of more modesty, rather than just blaming each other.

How powerful is “skin.” So powerful that I decided a couple of weeks ago that I needed to sign up for online accountability with Covenant Eyes. What does that mean? It means for $7 a month all of my online behavior is monitored and flagged where necessary. And then each week my wife, my brother, and two of my best friends get a report of what I was looking at during my online time during the week. I spend a lot of time on the internet, and I’m smart enough to know the power of sexuality, skin, porn and more online. It doesn’t matter that I’m a father, husband, friend or pastor. We are all susceptible to its temptations. I’ve heard people complain about paying for online monitoring, but come on…are you kidding me? This type of accountability is worth what it would cost two lattes at Starbucks.

I want to leave you with this latest post from Anne Jackson, my thoughts on boobies. Definitely a catching and controversial title. Anne is a pastor at LifeChurch.tv, and is the author of the book Mad Church Disease: The Church-Wide Burnout Epidemic. Check out her post at Relevant Magazine, Dirty Girls, The New Porn Addicts, as she talks about her struggle with pornography and the effects of it on her relationship.

Here is her entire post:

my thoughts on boobies
Written by Anne Jackson on May 7, 2008 – 12:32 pm

did you know?

–there is a female feature we call breasts. they can also be referred to as “boobies,” or “the twins,” or “the rack,” or “jugs,” so on, so forth.

–most men find this particular feature interesting. tempting. and amazing.

–upon catching a glimpse of said feature (regardless of how much is actually exposed), it is likely for a man’s mind to go to places it shouldn’t.

–with above knowledge, women, you now are educated and have no excuse.

–PLEASE USE WISDOM WHEN YOU DRESS YOURSELF.

aside: call me a prude. call me whatever. i don’t really care. and as much as this may seem like “casting judgment” (said in a very, scary, echo-y loud voice) on members of the female gender, please get a freaking clue.

i was doing some bloggy-clicking-around during my lunch and it amazes me how many “nice christian girls” (some who are even in church leadership – gasp!) show quite a bit of skin. in the office, at church parties, whatever (oh, and then post them ALL OVER THE INTERNET!)

please forgive me if it seems i have something stuck, as they say, where the sun don’t shine.

I DO.

it’s called modesty.

and if you are supposed to be living examples of godly women…you should too!

that is all.

sermon over.

please, carry on.

Female Drinkers in College, Wikipedia Ban, and Professor-Student Relationships…

These stories are courtesy of Ivy Jungle’s Campus Ministry Update for January 2008.

  • Female Drinkers: A recent report in the journal, Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research confirms that male college students consistently out drink their female counterparts, with one exception: parties with themes, especially sexual themes or costume parties. Those who play drinking games also drink more than those who do not. The report has special interest to researchers on alcohol consumption as it is not based on self-reporting but researcher observation at more than 60 off-campus college parties. (Inside Higher Education January 4, 2008)
  • Wikipedia Ban: Professors continue to ban Wikipedia as a research tool, citing too many incorrect entries. Designed as a user generated and edited encyclopedia, anyone can contribute to or change a Wikipedia entry. One professor at the University of Brighton has gone even further, banning the use of Google. Calling it “white bread for the mind,” she objects to the easy answers to complex questions with little sorting of shallow ideas from serious referenced work. She states, “Google is filling, but does not necessarily offer nutritional content.” (Inside Higher Education January 14, 2008)
  • Professor – Student Relationships: UCLA is one of a number schools which have restricted or banned relationships between professors and students with whom they have – or may have direct supervision. However, Dr. Paul Abrahmson, a married psychology professor at UCLA has drawn criticism for saying that as places of liberty, universities ought not restrict the behavior of consenting adults. He suggests students and faculty sign waivers, similar to a medical release that would warn of the dangers of power difference and favoritism in such relationships and not hold the university responsible for failed romances. Critics point to limits on dating in many work situations and believe the restrictions are important to protect students who may feel victims of harassment if and when a relationship ends. (Chicago Tribune, January 4, 2008 p. 5)

Thoughts:

  1. Is it surprising then that it seems like every fraternity on campus is constantly hosting costume parties with sexual themes (i.e. toga parties, “pimps and ho’s party”, sexy Halloween costumes, etc.)? This is for another post, but when alcohol consumption is up, well, usually sexual activity is as well in college. It’s also no surprise that many of the situations that we have had to counsel women in college about over the years were about the experiences at parties such as these where they drank too much and things got out of control. I think that’s why I’m sad, and generally grieved when I see some of the photos that pop up on Facebook with my students, especially the female students who look like they have drank too much, and guys are mobbed around them. Enough said.
  2. I love Wikipedia, but I think it should not be used as a serious research tool, cited in studies….but, it is a great launching pad to head in the right direction; to find good resources; and to get some easy, general information. I use it everyday.
  3. Glad to see that the school I work with is debating professor-student relationships. I’m surprised that it’s a psychology professor standing up for them. Yeah, not really. Seems to play into every movie stereotype about psychologists, especially in campus settings.
Page 5 of 5«12345