Tag Archive - New Media

You Must Protect Your Inner Fire if You Live Online

fire[image by Capture Queen]

I have been thinking a lot…a lot about Anne Jackson’s recent decision, Saying Goodbye to Facebook. And then yesterday she followed it up with an article at Purpose Driven, Why I Kissed Facebook Goodbye. Something that Anne said in the article really stuck out to me:

The ultimate question, for the social media world as for every other world, is this: Is how I’m spending my time bringing glory to God? When the online world becomes our only source of communication or inspiration, it may be time to take a little breather and log off.

What stuck with me is this. That since I have been more and more involved online, I feel that my ability to rest, sit in silence, listen, journal, and reap inspiration from the writers that fueled me for so long (the Bible, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Henri Nouwen, Annie Dillard, Eugene Peterson, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, etc.), has greatly dwindled. And ultimately, I think that has led to less creativity from me.

Maybe what many of us are wondering is how we protect the creativity and inner fire…that which gives us life and helps us contribute to the communities around us.

Continue Reading…

Exploring Virtual/Online Church


LifeChurch.tv Second Life Campus Tour

Douglas:

Is the virtual church a real/genuine church?

Andrew

Absolutely not. But neither is a physical gathering in a church building on a Sunday morning. The body of Christ is a spiritual aggregation of believers whose names are written in the Lamb’s book of life. That body finds itself aggregated, or called out into assembly with each other, in both physical and virtual gatherings. There are seeking non-believers in both physical and virtual aggregations so neither expression can claim to be fully church. And also, there are believers in physical churches who connect with each other online during the week and there are believers from cyber-churches and online faith communities who intentionally seek out physical meetings when possible. The dividing line between the two is therefore more artificial than actual. (Andrew Jones being interviewed by Doug Estes)

. Continue Reading…

Social Media: If It’s Only Tools, Then to What End?

Social Media as a Tool
If you look up social media on Wikipedia this is the first sentence you read.

Social media are primarily Internet- and mobile-based tools for sharing and discussing information among human beings.

So inherent in the discussion (at least here and I assume many other places) is the idea that when we think of social media (i.e. Twitter, Facebook, blogs, LinkedIn, You Tube, etc.)….we think tools.

So is social media, in and of itself….tools? Is it a tool that helps you do something (i.e. communicate, create, publish, etc.)?

Or is it more than just a tool? A space, destination, community, culture, etc.?

Social Media Beyond a Tool
I have discussed this issue with Tony Steward and I know the issue has arisen over at his blog as well. I won’t speak for Tony, but I think he would say both. Both a “space” and a “tool.”

I’m starting to think of it in these terms. It begins as a tool, but eventually leads one to a space, destination, community. In this process, the tool becomes pretty much second nature, and you no longer think of it in terms of a tool.

For example:
An artist works with paints, oils, brushes, canvas…those are tools. But the end product is the art.

A writer works with paper, pen, computer, typewriter…those are tools. But the end product is the art.

An athlete works with weights, exercise, drills…those are tools. But the end product is the athleticism.

A chef works with measuring cups, bowls, knives…those are the tools. But the end product is the meal.

All these tools ultimately lead each to who they are and what they do. The tools become second nature…something the artist or chef is aware of, but it’s not the tools that concerns them, but the art and the meal.

I think the same can be said of social media. Twitter, Facebook and my blog are just tools that I use…but my end product is relationships, connecting, going deeper, sharing life, etc. I, therefore, no longer think of social media as just my tools, but rather as something that leads me to where I want to go…it’s pretty much second nature. I don’t want to go too deep with this…but in and of themselves…Twitter, Facebook and my blog are just that…tools…if I have no end sight in mind…if there is nothing relational and community oriented connected to it.

The Christian Life
I started thinking about this also in terms of the Christian life. Dare I say, the Bible is just a tool, IF it doesn’t lead us to a living out of the reality it talks about and enables us to do. If we don’t exemplify the Fruit of the Spirit in our lives, or if we do not participate in the Body of Christ, using the spiritual gifts that we have been given(as well as a number of other passages), then haven’t we just left the Bible to be a tool, with no reality in our daily life? (Disclaimer: Not saying the Word of God is just a tool either…I’m saying we treat it as one if it leads us to no daily living out of its reality in our lives).

So if social media is only tools, then to what end? And if we as Christians only use social media as tools, with no greater purpose, then to what end?


Thoughts
I’m wrestling through this…thinking on this issue a lot. So any comments or dialogue is well appreciated.

My Blog Confession: How An Unfortunate Post I Wrote on John Piper 3 Years Ago Has Changed the Way I Blog

Apologies
John Saddington over at Church Crunch had a great post, Digital Apologies and Blog Confessionals. John’s post was in reference to Digg co-founder Kevin Rose’s apology about comments on his uber-popular video podcast Diggnation. John says:

Blogging, for most part and for many is a one-way street. It’s a digital megaphone to the public. It’s a personal soapbox and a electronic pulpit. It’s a place where apologies aren’t required.

But that’s if you hold the aforementioned definition of “blogging” to be true.

And for some, it is. For others, like myself, blogging is about relationships. You see, I’m more interested in using my blogs to build relationships with other people instead of making sure that my own voice can be heard in the blogospheric galaxy.

And just like in real relationships, things get tough: Feelings get hurt, things get twisted and go all Robbie Williams on you (read: “Misunderstood“). People get passionate and emotional, people get upset and say things they don’t really mean, people sin.

All this means is that people have to learn to apologize, and do it on their blog.

Passion & Blogging, Like Oil & Water…Often Don’t Mix Well
People are passionate and blogging is instantaneous. Mix the two together and you sometimes wish you could take back what you write. I have been blogging for over 4 years and it has taken me as long to be more cautious, careful and gracious when I post something, then say it did in the earlier years.

Blogging is often reactionary, and the quickest way to drive traffic to your site is to say something that can cause a reaction in others. Usually that is done by handling controversial issues, attacking popular figures in an industry/ministry, or by just plain and simple rabble rousing.

In the beginning that might seem fun as you engage a very passionate and rabble rousing crowd on your blog, but in the end, I don’t think that’s enough to sustain a life of blogging. Nor is it sufficient to bring joy into your blogging life. Nor does it often lead to positive change or transformation in the lives of those who read your blog, as well as yourself. It’s difficult to build relationships with those who you are constantly engaged in criticism, contempt and combative behavior with…assuming you want any type of relationship at all. But I think it’s the relationships that are formed, and when they are formed, it’s the synergy that is created online that can lead to long term positive change, not only for the web, but the worlds we inhabit and ultimately the Kingdom of God.

This Is My Confession
Almost 3 years ago I wrote one of those posts I wish I could take back. It wasn’t a post I wanted to take back because I didn’t believe in what I was saying (theologically), but rather it was more vitriolic than I would have liked coming from myself. And it was attackful on the person and character of John Piper, rather than just being in disagreement over views. I wrote it in a fit of passion (aka anger, hurt, sadness, grief, etc.) and published it instantly (Background: my mom, grandmother, aunt and some other loved ones of mine died of breast cancer–so a warning to us all to step back when topics become too emotionally engaging for us–that is not a good time to blog and publish instantly). I hesitate to even bring it up since it has been laid to rest, but John Saddington’s post is a good reminder of our continual need to not only make apologies and seek forgiveness with those in our personal lives, but with those lives we are in contact with online.

My original post was fueled by John Piper’s comments on his battle with cancer.

Whether you read my posts or not (and I sort of hope you don’t), you can see that an initial post written in a moment of passion and instant publishing turned into a total of four posts as things spiraled out of control, misunderstandings occurred, feelings were hurt, theologies attacked, and good people without the context of a relationship…misunderstood. In hindsight, I pretty much still hold to those same theological positions that I held then…but I wish I never would have posted that blog…or at least I wish I never would have posted it without being more gracious, or without first seeking to contact John Piper and have a conversation to gain more understanding. But I did post, and I didn’t do the latter. But hopefully 3 years later I am more mature and living and learning as I blog and as I forgive and am forgiven in the process.

Meeting Abraham Piper Made Things Real
A year and a half after that blog post I was contacted by a guy named Abraham Piper on Facebook. He was wanting to connect at GodblogCon ’07 in Las Vegas. When I saw that last name I was like, “Doh, can that possibly be…John Piper’s son?” And it was. I was nervous to meet him, knowing what I had said about his father. When we met, I nervously offered up my apology for speaking about his father in that way. He immediately said not to worry about it, and that it’s pretty much a waste of energy to hold a grudge or not be forgiving of those who have criticisms of you (those are my words, not his). And I got the impression that as John Piper’s son, he was probably used to his father receiving both praise and criticism.

We continued to hang out the next few days and have a really good time of engaging conversation with one another and those at the conference. What that encounter did was put a real context, real relationship, real human face on the person of John Piper…all through my encounter with his son. From that moment I vowed to do my best to think with more clarity and wisdom and grace before I posted negative stuff (criticisms, etc.) about another person, group of people, etc. I’ve tried and somedays I succeed and other days I fail. Hopefully I succeed on more of them.

But because of my relationship (albeit through his son Abraham) with John Piper, I am more understanding of what kind of quality man, and passionate Christian he is. Therefore, with the context of the relationship it’s much easier to be gracious in our disagreements, knowing that as followers of Christ we can be united in so much more than our theological differences. And with the context of a relationship, it’s much easier for us to humble ourselves and ask for and seek forgiveness.

So Let’s Be Congruent
This is where online meets real life…they go hand in hand, and they will continue to go more hand in hand as the web becomes a much larger part of our lives than it already is. This is where our online and offline worlds must become more congruent, and we must become more consistent as people in relationships with one another, and as followers in Christ.

So Abraham. I appreciate your kindness, graciousness and forgiveness. I don’t know if you ever read the posts (and I hope you didn’t, and still don’t–because I’m a different blogger now). And John, if you ever did read them, I apologize for the personal attacks…and though we land in different theological camps I appreciate your ministry, and the lives of the people that you impacted whom I’m in direct relationships with.

So What About You
Have you ever put your foot in your mouth, were less than kind, or wish you could take something back you wrote on your blog?

Please share what it was (if you want to), and how you handled it? Did you apologize? Confess? Seek the person out?

Blog on friends….

If This Doesn’t Convince You to Use Twitter…I’m Afraid Nothing Will

Twitter is one of those things that either you get or you don’t. If you don’t get it, then you probably won’t miss it that much since it was never a part of your daily life. But if you get Twitter, and you have used it, then you understand just how powerful a tool it is…and you probably can’t imagine not using it on a daily basis.

It has revolutionized the way I do many things in the area of communication, work, relationships, hobbies, news, trends, collaboration, etc. Not to mention that in the last couple of months approximately 75% of the people that I meet, collaborate with, and talk over coffee with are people I have met and communicated with on Twitter.

How else can I convince you to use Twitter?

Let me try…Let’s start with a video.

If that is not suffice, then keep reading.

  1. Twitter for Ministry and Church-A Business Perspective.  This is a comprehensive list put together by Church Crunch. All you need to know and more.
  2. Formulating an Online Strategy for College Ministry: Part 5–How Twitter Can Catalyze Your Ministry This is one of the first posts that I compiled about Twitter and ministry. I still would like to see more college ministries, and ministries in general unleash the power of Twitter in their groups.
  3. FB Friends….Twitter=FB Status Update. U Should Get On Board This is my off-the-cuff passionate plea to my Facebook friends to start using Twitter. I wrote it after people were wondering how my Facebook status was changing so often…Twitter. In fact, several people have told me that this post convinced them to try Twitter, and they love it.
  4. Stay tuned for a magazine article I just completed on Twitter…I think you will like it.

If you are not convinced after watching the video and reading all the links, I’m wondering what will convince you. I’m curious to know.

“Taking Online Community Offline:” What I’m Doing About It And My 2009 Goal

Great guest post by Leo Wurschmidt over at Church Crunch today, Meatspace Monday 4–CLT WordCamp–Taking the Online Community Offline.

I love the phrase, “taking the online community offline.”

For as big a fan as I am of social media, online community, online communication, etc…..

Here is what I think is social media/new media/technology (whatever you call it) greatest asset:


IT’S ABILITY TO FACILITATE THE MEETING OF PEOPLE IN PERSON.

In my tendency to ramble I could say tons more, but won’t for now. That being said, because it is it’s greatest asset, I have made a goal for 2009.


2009 Goal (as stated on Twitter this last Friday): meet & have coffee with every person in the DFW metroplex that I’m connected to on Twitter, Facebook or my blog. Cool?

I don’t know how I will exactly achieve this goal, but I have some ideas that I’m working on from larger group meet-ups to one on one, small group times. So stay tuned as I talk more about this in the coming month and a half.

Oh, and I’ve already been getting requests for coffee since I sent out that Tweet. If I can just say upfront…I can’t afford to pay for coffee for all of you. So how about we just agree that we all pay for ourselves. Haaa

Post Media/Postmodern: Communicating Our Stories Effectively

Chris Brogan has a fascinating post, Communications in a Post Media World. He begins by saying,

When Google is the front door, the side door, the hidden key under the mat, the cash register, the finder of everything we ever lost, and everything we wished we’d lost, what comes next? When everyone is a newspaper, a magazine, a TV station, a radio station, a conference, a curator, an educator, a business owner, a shopkeeper, what do we have? When you and I are the creators, the consumers, and the collaborators of this media, what does this mean to us?

The gatekeepers are still out there. Neither you nor I can write for the New York Times or put a film up on the BBC. We can’t just bind up our book and stick it on the shelf at Waterstones or Chapters. We can’t waltz into any giant corporation and offer up our products.

Maybe we’re just preachers and nonprofit types. Maybe we just want to reach people like us in all this noise. How do we connect? This might just be the wilderness of a million signals, the atomization of the world’s voices, the fall of the tower of Babel. Again.

Check out his entire post, as it is a great challenge for us to think how communication has changed, and how we must re-think how we can communicate more effectively in what he describes as a “post media world.”

I really like the term that he (and some others) is using. As a former college pastor, and a current youth ministry/pastoral care mentor/trainer I have been thinking about communication using a slightly different term.

How do we communicate in a postmodern world? Some will debate whether or not there is such a thing as postmodernity. Others will see it as simply a tool, philosophy, theology, ethos that one can choose, or choose not to gravitate towards. I happen to believe that postmodernity is real (I know some of you are saying duh..haaa), and that it’s not an option for us to decide whether or not we will or will not think of how to communicate more effectively to it. It’s not just a worldview, but its in the air we breathe…you don’t have to like it, but with that in mind, I’m wondering how communication has changed in a postmodern world?

If we are in “post media world” as Brogan and others suggest….and if postmodernity is alive and well, then how can we use the technology, the social media tools, and craft a message, story, communication that reaches those who we are trying to reach?

I don’t have a detailed answer to give you. You might have one, and I hope you share. But I’m definitely thinking through the rapidly changing world that is brought on by the reduction of hierarchy through social media tools, and what implications that has (especially for those of us in ministry) for us as we think about communicating the gospel in a noisy world. If we all have the ability to share and communicate a message, just not personally, but online, how do we effectively communicate it without getting lost?

Which begs a bigger question that I was thinking about after reading Brent Thomas (@brent_thomas) Tweet the other day.

“if the message isn’t attractive, & the people of God aren’t attractive, then we must not be telling or living the story right”
07:06 AM November 10, 2008 from txt

In a “post media/postmodern world” are we telling the right story effectively? Are we even telling the story? Is the gospel story more attractive than the other competing stories? And are we expecting only pastors, clergy, ministry leaders to communicate the story, or are all of us communicating the story of how God has transformed our lives?

Last, what do churches do when they are no longer the front door to the gospel? Do we even realize that the physical building isn’t the front door anymore, but that the online world is the front door? If you don’t have a strong presence, or aren’t telling a good story online, which is the front door–will you be able to bring people from the online world, to the physical front door of the church?

My Social Media Addiction Update!

Curbing My Addiction
About two weeks ago I wrote the post, You Might Be A Social Media Addict If……Setting Boundaries On Social Media. In that post I proposed the 10 things that I was going to try to help curb my addiction. Two weeks is hardly an experiment, but I figured if I can’t be disciplined for two weeks, well then, maybe I’m in trouble. Below are the 10 things.

So here is what I am proposing I do:

  1. Blog no more than 3 posts a week.
  2. Stop email coming to my phone.
  3. Stop checking Twitter on my phone. Only online.
  4. Check Facebook only 1 time a day.
  5. 10pm Internet Rule: Once 10 hits I can’t be online anymore.
  6. Family Time: Focus on being present. No thinking about being online, or wanting to Twitter about something if it takes me away from being present (this is more subjective)
  7. Visit no more than 25 blogs a day.
  8. Saturday Sabbath: No internet (I’m not talking about checking a phone number or address) surfing.
  9. No Twittering on Sunday
  10. When I am with family (dinner with wife, playing with daughter)…no Twittering. This is subjective sometimes, because my wife and I might want to Twitter about something we are doing so the family can see. But you get the point.

So How Did I Do

  1. Blog no more than 3 posts a week: SUCCEED. So far so good. I limited by posts pretty much, but did post one extra little blurb one day. I really felt a lot of great freedom in setting that criteria, rather than living under the pressure to always post. But I have decided to change this rule to 3 days of blogging rather than 3 posts. I just found that sometimes I wanted to write more. So it gives me the freedom to most more than once on one of those three days, or to write up some drafts ahead of time that can be released on certain days. I will probably settle on some 3 day rhythm Monday–Friday.
  2. Stop email coming to my phone. FAIL, FAIL, FAIL. Attempted to disconnect it, and after not finding the command easily, abandoned the idea and failed miserably. Date package might be coming to an end on my phone though.
  3. Stop checking Twitter on my phone. Only online. FAIL, FAIL, FAIL. This started out good, but by the 3rd day I was all over Twitter on my phone.
  4. Check Facebook only 1 time a day. SUCCEED. I have continued to keep this up only getting on about once a day. There might have been a two day in there, but for the most part, one time a day has been suffice.
  5. 10pm Internet Rule: Once 10 hits I can’t be online anymore. SUCCEED. I did send one email one time at about 11pm, but I was always off before 10 on all the other days. This has been a good rule. Shutting it down early and not taking online work with me in my mind so close to bed is really helpful.
  6. Family Time: Focus on being present. No thinking about being online, or wanting to Twitter about something if it takes me away from being present (this is more subjective). SUCCEED. I made a huge effort to not be online when my wife and daughter were with me. If my wife had to work late one night and my daughter was asleep I would hop online. But chose not to surf the web while we were together, and limited Twitter to times where we both wanted to send a message out about what we were doing together.
  7. Visit no more than 25 blogs a day. SUCCEED. I have stopped going to my Google Reader, and I search/read no more than 25 blogs a day, trying to switch up who I read, and the variety of content that I read throughout the week.
  8. Saturday Sabbath: No internet (I’m not talking about checking a phone number or address) surfing. SUCCEED. Have not hopped online at all on a Saturday. Love having that be totally unplugged.
  9. No Twittering on Sunday. SEMI-FAIL. Instead of not Twittering on Sunday, I chose not to Twitter on Saturday and succeeded, being unplugged from computer and Twitter all day. I did end up Twittering 1-2 times on those Sundays though instead.
  10. When I am with family (dinner with wife, playing with daughter)…no Twittering. This is subjective sometimes, because my wife and I might want to Twitter about something we are doing so the family can see. But you get the point. SUCCEED. Didn’t Twitter unless my wife and I wanted a message to go out.

So all in all, not too bad. But I still need to tinker and adjust some things. I will keep you updated.

Where Do You Fall on the Graph?


HT: Marcus Hackler

The Inagural Church Tech Camp–And the Role of the Pastor in the Age of Technology

I wish I could have been there this morning with the crew at Church Tech Camp, but since I couldn’t, it was great to watch it live and participate.

Props to Tony Steward for putting on the “unconference.” And props to #churchtechcamp making the Twitter trends today and making it on the Twitter blog.

Check out some of Tony’s thoughts on the day.

Check out the live blog from Church Tech Camp today as well.

You can see my question on the live blog that I posed to the audience.

11:22
[Comment From rhettsmith]
I’m wondering if we move more and more towards open source in the Church…what role do you see the pastor taking?

There was some lengthy discussion about my question and what I meant. But in general, I wonder with the ability for congregations to quickly self organize and communicate without having to go through the pastor, the hierarchy, etc., what role will the pastor take in the future? I think many pastors are nervous about losing power, status and position that has always been afforded them from behind the pulpit, so what if they are no longer needed? And by that, I don’t mean they won’t speak, preach or teach, but what if their particular brand of one person leadership is not needed? Will they become more of a facilitator? Are the traditional vocational roles of the pastor in jeopardy (as in paid staff)? Lots of questions I am asking.

But what I’m really thinking is that the decentralization of the pastor is actually a great thing for a church community, and it places the pastor in a role that I think he or she was meant to be in. That of shepherd, facilitator, etc. Someone who leads from within….not above or out in front.

P.S. Thanks to Rich Kirkpatrick for being my voice in person at the conference when I was actually in Dallas. He helped better finesse and define some of the questions I was having trouble articulating.

Page 1 of 512345»