Tag Archive - Culture-Movies-Music

“Introverts in the Church” — Interview with Adam S. McHugh/Part 2

Adam McHughOn Tuesday I posted the first part of my interview with Adam McHugh (“Introverts in the Church” — Interview with Adam S. McHugh/Part 1), whom you can find blogging and writing here. As I’ve already said about a million times already, his new book, Introverts in the Church: Finding Our Place in an Extroverted Culture is a great book. It’s not too late to pick it up for Christmas…for the introverts and extroverts in your life. Everyone needs to read it. And I will go as far to say that if you are in ministry, it would be a shame if you didn’t read it–I think you would be missing out on a piece of the puzzle when it comes to how you serve, minister, understand and raise up other leaders.

Here is part 2:

R: What are the 2-3 most important things that can introverts teach us?

A: I’m glad you asked this question, because too often it seems that introversion is viewed as a liability, rather than a gift. I know I’ve been guilty of defining introversion in terms of what I’m not rather than what I am. Here are the two most important things I think introverts bring to the church: 1. The value of listening and 2. The need to slow down.

People in our culture so rarely have the experience of being truly listened to, of being given the space to express what’s on their hearts. Too often we speak over one another, interrupt one another, compete for space to speak. Because introverts process internally, and consider what they say before they speak, they can be incredible listeners. We offer a non-judgmental presence that helps others open up to us. Now, there’s more to listening than just not speaking, and it’s a discipline to be cultivated (my next book is about listening!), but introverts have a good start in becoming excellent listeners, communicating deep love for others through listening. I think listening is a tremendous asset in evangelism, which I talk about in chapter 8. Second, introverts often lead a slower, quieter, more contemplative lifestyle and we help people in our fast-paced culture slow down. We bring a calming presence to people and to our churches. Modern-day evangelicalism tends to be so full, so busy, so hurried and weighed down by agendas, and I say in the book that introverts are part of the antidote to what ails evangelical culture.

R: Let me throw out a couple of technologies that are being used in the Church and let me just get your response in regard to introverts. What would introverts think of twittering in the church? How about online church?

A: I knew you were going to ask me this! I’ll say first that, as an introvert, I am grateful for social media like Facebook and Twitter. It has helped me make connections, and deepen relationships, with people that I just don’t have the energy for in face-to-face situations. I’m often much better in writing than I am in person. But I do think there are inherent dangers in online communication, especially when it becomes a substitute for in-person relationships, and I worry when introverts spend far more time online than they do with people. Again, I address these issues in the book.

Twitter in church seems to be becoming the 21st century version of note-taking, but I actually think it’s an extroverted form of processing. Since it’s not acceptable to talk during a sermon, tweeting is a way that extroverts can think “aloud.” As a preacher, I can’t say I’m wild about the idea of people tweeting while I’m preaching. It seems like people in our technologically driven culture are in so many places at once, and perhaps worship should be one time a week that we seek to bring all of ourselves into unity– heart, mind, soul, body, and typing fingers.

As far as online church, I’m ambivalent. For people in countries where Christianity is banned, and for those people who simply will not cross the threshold of a church, then it’s a great thing. But, no matter how introverted you are, we all need embodied relationships and if we can’t find them in the body of Christ, then I’m not sure where we can find them. Second, people who are uncomfortable being in church are usually not resisting church attendance because of introversion but because of shyness, experiences of rejection, and other wounds. If we have been wounded by people and churches, then it seems to me that full healing will actually come when we find those people and churches, who communicate, in full, embodied form, the gentleness, compassion, and love of Jesus. I’m really grateful that the Son of God didn’t just get on a web-cam in heaven but actually incarnated into full human form and walked and lived among us. Online church may be an excellent step for many of those people, but my hope is that it is only a step.

R: What do you think is the most important takeaway for ministry for pastors who read this book? What will pastors learn from this book that will equip them better as a leader?

I devote two chapters in the book trying to demonstrate how pastors and other Christian leaders don’t have to keep masquerading as extroverts and can actually lead as introverts. That’s the main takeaway: lead as yourselves!! In chapter 6 I draw from biblical models of leadership, which center around character not personality, as well as models of leadership from the corporate and non-profit worlds which emphasize servant leadership, humility, reflection, and introspection. In chapter 7, the longest chapter, I go into ministry practicals for introverted leaders and discuss partnering with extroverts, following the model of Jesus in investing in “the few,” preaching as an introvert, and tailoring our jobs and schedules to suit our introverted rhythms and strengths.

R: I think you do a great job of dispelling the myth that those who retreated to the desert or to solitude were doing so to escape. Instead you seem to say that when we seek solitude we are better able to move forward into action because of the contemplation/solitude. Is that an accurate statement?

Henri Nouwen said that compassion is the fruit of solitude. When we go deep into ourselves and invite God to show us as we truly are, we find true identity. We find the good things about ourselves, our gifts, and also the ugly things – the jealousy, the fear, the anger, the desire to objectify and control others – but if we open ourselves to God’s grace in those ugly places, we can find deep compassion both for ourselves and for others. That compassion propels us to action and to works of mercy and justice. Before Jesus began his public ministry, he spent 40 days in the wilderness with only the word of God to sustain him. Throughout the history of the church, great leaders and highly influential people like St. Anthony, St. Patrick, Martin Luther, and countless others have found the impetus to love and to lead in solitude.

A Philosophy of Book Reading to Combat Social Media Saturation

27874347_6b90a51d9f
[image by annais]


Throughout the years I have been presented with various philosophies (systems, ways of approaching it) of reading.

  • When I was in grade school I remember the philosophy was basically quantity. The more books I read, especially in the summer time, the more ribbons the library gave me for my achievement.
  • When I was in high school and college the philosophy seemed to be that one better read the material because it will probably be on the exam.
  • When I was in seminary the philosophy was presented to me that my reading was analogous to filling up a reservoir of wisdom and knowledge that I would continually draw upon throughout my ministry.

All of these philosophies have been varied in their approach, but ultimately they have really led me to a love of reading.  But there are so many, many books out there to read.  I actually remember my dad at one point lamenting the fact that he would not be able to read all the books he desired to read before he died one day.

Bite Size Social Media
One of the reasons that I have tried to pull back on, and set better boundaries around my online-social media use, is because my discipline of reading was losing out to the number of hours I spent online.  And in that process I had begun to notice that I was becoming more of a consumer of bite sized information.  It was getting easier and easier to browse through hundreds of articles on a daily basis, and harder and harder to read through a book and let it saturate me. And in the end, very few (and I mean very few) social media avenues actually had the ability to bring about new awareness, insight, and ultimately transformation in my life. I had more and more information, but I wasn’t feeling more knowledgeable, especially in the sense of deep, life changing transformation.

In John Dyer’s post Dostoyevsky’s 1984 Saved Him from Our Brave New World, I came across the fascinating section where John, speaking about Dostoyevsky, says this:

During his exile, the only reading material that he had was a copy of the New Testament and Psalms. Though he was raised in the Orthodox church, he describes this as the time in which he came to know Jesus and experienced conversion. With no access to anything but the most significant literature ever written, he read the Scriptures over and over until it completely saturated him. And it formed his mind to create the highest of art.

Information Deprivation vs. Information Overload

Postman points out two major concerns:

1. The kind of information we intake is insignificant.
2. The amount of information we intake overshadows what little significant information we do intake.

In other words, if you read a passage of Scripture in the morning, then later consume lots of TV shows, blogs, and advertisements, it doesn’t matter if the content is morally good or morally bad, the sheer volume of information will dilute anything truly great and tend you toward seeking more and more insignificant material.

Why Take In Books?
Whether the book comes in a hard copy or digital copy does not matter. The point is that a book requires something of you. It requires time and commitment. Browsing the web does not…at least for me. I’m not saying that one can’t form a discipline on browsing the web, but it’s rare, especially because the click of a button is so close.

When I read a book I have to set-time aside to do it. Usually that means something else is getting put on hold. I’m not on the computer. I’m not watching TV. I’m not at my desk working. I’m not in conversation at coffee with someone. Reading a book requires me to carve out time for it, and it requires a level of commitment if I want to read through it. Reading books also takes a lot of work, and if we don’t exercise that muscle it is bound to atrophy. I’ve begun to notice that several things have begun to atrophy when I was spending inordinate amounts of time online. Writing by hand has become more difficult. Patience has become more difficult. Imagination was lacking because the computer did the imagining for me. My intellectual skills were dulling because I was jumping from bite size to bite size pieces of data.

My Philosophy of Reading
I’ve always been an avid reader and usually have a number of books on my desk or bedside table at once. I’m not good at reading one book and moving onto the next. I like a handful at once, and then another handful after those are read. In order to keep a balance in my reading and to make sure I’m hitting on all cylinders I’ve developed a little philosophy of reading for myself.

These are the four types of books I’m looking to read at one time:

Intellectual Rigor…
In my rotation at all times is a book that I deem to be of great intellectual rigor. This is usually a book that is slow going and may require me to keep a dictionary or thesaurus handy as I read. It often requires me to re-read sentences and paragraphs a number of times before I can move on. These are books that may only allow me to read 3-10 pages at a time because I need to process what has been written. Sometimes I will set the book aside for days or even a few weeks before I return to it. They are ultimately books that help one establish, and undergird their philosophies in life. Think of them as cornerstones or anchors.

Vocationally Practical…
This is not to say that that books above are not vocationally practical, but that these books are more accessible and sometimes requires less intellectual rigor in reading them. They are often designed specifically for certain topics that allow fairly easy consumption. These are the books in the area of business, therapy, ministry, design, etc. that one finds helpful tips in them, but they aren’t necessarily saying anything groundbreaking or new. They may bring new focus to the topic, but they are often built upon the philosophies/theologies of many, many writers before them. I would say that these are the most commonly read non-fiction books.

Fiction/Novel…
I find it a requirement for myself that I always have one book of fiction in the rotation. Without fiction I find that my imagination begins to atrophy. I also find that characters and narrative provide amazing insight into life, work and play that “practical non-fiction” books do not. I also know it’s a tendency, especially for those involved in ministry and other work settings to find themselves only reading “practical non-fiction” books relating to their profession.

Hobbies…
I usually have one book that I’m reading that pertains to one of my hobbies. This is a great way to learn more about what I enjoy doing, provide insight, helpful tips, and help me delve deeper into my passion.

There is not a time limit on when these books have to be read by, but I do my best to keep them in a rotation each day/week.  Sometimes it takes several weeks.  Sometimes a few month or two.

What Say You?
Do you have a philosophy of reading?

What works best for you?

Creating Relational Intimacy Through the Sharing of Minor Details in Life

528386175_4629d98a16
[image by Tom Purves]


One of the things about Twitter that I have not quite been able to explain that well is why I think the little details in life that one tweets about (eating cereal, going for a walk, crying after that movie, hanging with friends, etc.) are so fascinating. I can’t tell you how many times various relationships in my life have been enhanced through what sometimes seem like trivial knowledge shared through Twitter. It’s quite extraordinary. So I love coming across this idea of “ambient intimacy” which I think explains it well.

I find this post by Leisa on “ambient intimacy” so right on. Check out her thoughts below from her post on this subject.

I find myself talking about Twitter quite a lot. I’m not the only one. The behaviours that Twitter has made more visible are tremendously interesting.

I’ve been using a term to describe my experience of Twitter (and also Flickr and reading blog posts and Upcoming). I call it Ambient Intimacy.

Ambient intimacy is about being able to keep in touch with people with a level of regularity and intimacy that you wouldn’t usually have access to, because time and space conspire to make it impossible. Flickr lets me see what friends are eating for lunch, how they’ve redecorated their bedroom, their latest haircut. Twitter tells me when they’re hungry, what technology is currently frustrating them, who they’re having drinks with tonight.

Who cares? Who wants this level of detail? Isn’t this all just annoying noise? There are certainly many people who think this, but they tend to be not so noisy themselves. It seems to me that there are lots of people for who being social is very much a ‘real life’ activity and technology is about getting stuff done.

There are a lot of us, though, who find great value in this ongoing noise. It helps us get to know people who would otherwise be just acquaintances. It makes us feel closer to people we care for but in whose lives we’re not able to participate as closely as we’d like.

Knowing these details creates intimacy. (It also saves a lot of time when you finally do get to catchup with these people in real life!) It’s not so much about meaning, it’s just about being in touch.

Have you found that “ambient intimacy” has enhanced your relationships? How?

Wess Daniels: What Are You Passionate About?

danielswess2Who Is Wess Daniels?
That’s hard for me to sum up in just a few words because Wess does a lot of different things, and he does them really well. He’s one of the more eclectic friends (loves technology, but also obsessed with vinyl records as of late) I have, and he’s definitely one of the smartest, and someone I look to for wisdom on many issues. I met Wess a couple of years ago at Fuller Theological Seminary where he is working on his Ph.D., studying under Dr. Ryan Bolger. Let me tell you in his own words a little about him:

I am a PhD student at Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena CA, and am in the School of Intercultural Studies working in the area of Western culture and peace church issues. My hope is to teach classes in a college or seminary setting on Church and Culture. As a Quaker, my interests lay in free church theology and practice. I am also interested in the growing green movement and how the church might embrace this as a call for the future.

You can also find out a little more about Wess below:


Gathering In Light Introduction Video from wess on Vimeo.

My favorite thing about Wess though is that he is a great father and husband, and we had some fun times walking through Old Town Pasadena pushing our daughters in our baby strollers, sipping coffee and trying to have deep conversation while our daughters were all over the place…but that’s real life and I enjoyed those times.

Check out Wess’ blog Gathering in Light which is one of my favorites. Connect with him on Twitter, as well as check out his writings at Barclay Press. And for all you tech/social media people, Wess is someone I would be listening to.

In His Own Words…

What are you really passionate about?

Currently I am working on research about the future of the church, with a direct emphasis on the Quaker tradition, because that’s who I am and what is closest to me, but really I am most passionate about vibrant, radical and inspiring expressions of Christian faith in our today’s “global information culture.” In my research I am looking for people who are traversing the various boundaries we have set up within our Christian institutions. You’ve already had people on here Rhett who are doing things very much like what I’m talking about, Tony and Mike, are both explorers, looking at new ways to express faith and they are doing this at the crossroads of something old/new. I like to call this hybrid or remix Christianity – take our tradition(s), add a dose of contemporary culture, multiply this by faith and throw in a bit of creativity and see what you’ve got.

Continue Reading…

Innovation3 Gathering–Live Blog by Rhett Smith (Tuesday & Wednesday)

I’m very excited to be a part of the live blogging team for the Innovation3 Gathering, put on by Leadership Network, and hosted by Bent Tree Bible Fellowship.

I hope that you can join me on my blog Tuesday and Wednesday as I will live blog 4 specific sessions, and as much of the rest of the event that I can. I hope to see your input and comments throughout the day (via this blog and Twitter–please use the #i3 hashtag), and if you have any questions you would like me to pose the speakers in or out of their sessions, please let me know. You can reach me via the live blog or on Twitter @rhetter.

If you are having trouble viewing this live blog, try watching it in a pop-up window: Click Here

Not only can YOU participate, but the tweets of 11 other Twitterers will post automatically to the live blog. So stay tuned for their behind the scenes insight and thoughts: gregatkinson, cynthiaware, djchuang, scottmcclellan, decart, lancebauslaugh, camron_ware, flowerdust, innovation3, tonymorganlive and mbstockdale.

Connect In Other Ways

Innovation3 Twitter Announcements @innovation3

Innovation3 Twitter Hashtag #i3

Innovation3 Website

Innovation3 Blog

Innovation3 Flickr Photostream

Innovation3 Bloggers Meetup/Tweetup

See you there in person or online….

Book Review: Tribes by Seth Godin

You can find my book review of Tribes by Seth Godin over at Leadership Network’s book blog.

Check it out, Heretics Needed in the Church.

Forgivess is Hard to Come by and Judgment Abounds in This Political Season

Political seasons can be rough at times because nothing seems to bring up more debate than our political beliefs, and often our theological beliefs which we often see as closely related or intend to integrate.

I’ve become very disullisioned at times with the political process and the malicious 24 hour news cycle that accompanies it.

Two themes have really discouraged me in this election season. A lack of forgiveness and a spirit of judgment aimed at both candidates.

Though I could expound to great length, let me just suggest two glaring instances and then close this post.

First, a lack of forgiveness. I’m quite shocked and appalled at the number of people (especially Christians) who keep bringing up John McCain’s first marriage, often referring to tabloid articles and sensationalist material. McCain described the failure of his first marriage as his “greatest moral failure” in his interview with Rick Warren at Saddleback. If that is the case, then are we to take him at his word and forgive him…for something that happened over 30 years ago? And even if we don’t believe him, is it really our responsibility to be the moral police on this issue, determining whether or not we will or will not forgive?

So whether you like McCain or his politics should not matter, but to continue to bring up an issue I think reflects on our culture, and especially negative on us as Christians who are unwilling to forgive, and in fact bring up pass transgressions.

Second, judgmental behavior. Like above, I too have been shocked and appalled by people (especially Christians) who have been so quick to judge, and been judgmental towards Barack Obama. I have seen a real strong sense of judgment from others towards his full name (Barack Hussein Obama), implying because of that that he must be Muslim or have ties to Muslim extremists. Or that he can’t be a Christian, or is the enemy of Christianity. This can be seen in the mass chain email that everyone was asked to forward that claimed he is a “radical Muslim” who “will not recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

You may have even been someone who forwarded that email to others.

So whether you like Obama or his politics should not matter, we shouldn’t be passing judgment on him because of the fear of others. I think it reflects negatively again not only on us as a culture, but as Christians as well.

I think that whether we have voiced these views or not…either one of them…we have probably all been guilty of at least thinking something like it. True? False?

And I know, there are many more issues I could have raised, but these two just came to mind.

As a Christian and a citizen I believe that being involved in politics is important for us and a worthy obligation. But I am a Christian first and a citizen second, and my faith is not in the rulers or powers or principalities of this world, but in Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior. So at the end of the day, no matter who is in the Presidential Office, my faith is not in them, and my energy and strength will not be spent fretting and worrying about that. I will vote and be active, but not put faith in them as the end all. As the Apostle Paul says in Ephesians our struggle is not against the rulers of this world, but spiritual forces (Eph. 6:12).

Thoughts?

Agree?

Disagree?

Bill Mahrer’s New Movie, “Religulous”

Saw this over at Anne Jackson’s blog today.



I don’t get too fired up when people make movies, or write books disputing what I believe…even in an inconsiderate and mocking way. I’m actually pretty curious.

I agree with this commenter at Anne’s blog:

Brian Baute said,
August 11, 2008 at 12:03 pm

I’d be more interested if it weren’t Maher. It’s like watching Lou Dobbs talk about immigration or Rush Limbaugh talk about Democrats – you know what’s coming out of his mouth before he even says it, so why bother? The topic could be so interesting in the hands of someone who might surprise us with their analysis or commentary once in a while instead of beating the same drum the same way with every word out of his mouth.

What do you think?

Will you go see it?

The Sexualization of our Children

 

Now that I’m a parent I am obviously thinking about the issue more, especially since I have a baby girl. It’s amazing to me how early little girls are being sexualized in advertising and culture.

Here is the book mentioned in the interview:

So Sexy So Soon: The New Sexualized Childhood and What Parents Can Do to Protect Their Kids.

“The only way to change culture is to make more culture.” Agree or Disagree?

Andy Crouch on culture and his new book, Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling.

Page 1 of 212»