Archive - October, 2008

Economics Is More Than Money–Re-Thinking How We Use Our Time

Seth Godin has a killer post, Is effort a Myth.

He has me thinking about the economy…but not in terms of money…but rather the economy of time.

How we spend our time is as important as how we spend our money.

I like the practical advice he gives on just taking a 120 minutes, and re-thinking how you spend it.

You can see his thoughts below:

And that’s the key to the paradox of effort: While luck may be more appealing than effort, you don’t get to choose luck. Effort, on the other hand, is totally available, all the time.

This is a hard sell. Diet books that say, “eat less, exercise more,” may work, but they don’t sell many copies.

With that forewarning, here’s a bootstrapper’s/marketer’s/entrepreneur’s/fast-rising executive’s effort diet. Go through the list and decide whether or not it’s worth it. Or make up your own diet. Effort is a choice, at least make it on purpose:

1. Delete 120 minutes a day of ‘spare time’ from your life. This can include TV, reading the newspaper, commuting, wasting time in social networks and meetings. Up to you.

2. Spend the 120 minutes doing this instead:

* Exercise for thirty minutes.
* Read relevant non-fiction (trade magazines, journals, business books, blogs, etc.)
* Send three thank you notes.
* Learn new digital techniques (spreadsheet macros, Firefox shortcuts, productivity tools, graphic design, html coding)
* Volunteer.
* Blog for five minutes about something you learned.
* Give a speech once a month about something you don’t currently know a lot about.

3. Spend at least one weekend day doing absolutely nothing but being with people you love.

4. Only spend money, for one year, on things you absolutely need to get by. Save the rest, relentlessly.

If you somehow pulled this off, then six months from now, you would be the fittest, best rested, most intelligent, best funded and motivated person in your office or your field. You would know how to do things other people don’t, you’d have a wider network and you’d be more focused.

It’s entirely possible that this won’t be sufficient, and you will continue to need better luck. But it’s a lot more likely you’ll get lucky, I bet.

I was thinking about how much time I waste just surfing. And I don’t mean surfing in the ocean. But surfing on the web, the TV, through magazines that are pointless and candy/bubblegum for the brain (i.e. think sensational, gossip, celebrity, etc.)

Here are some ways that I would like to re-think, re-do my time.

  1. Check email only twice a day.  In the afternoon (around lunch) and then before work is over (around 5 or 6).

  2. Remove, or lower my data package on my Blackberry so that I can’t be online as much.  And turn off my email that comes to my phone.

  3. Reduce the amount of TV shows that I watch.  I like a lot, so that will be tough.  Replace that TV time with reading, relaxing, spending time with my wife.  And by time, not the time we spend watching TV, but real interactional, connecting time.

  4. Spend more time with my family when I’m with my family.  That means cut back on texting, Twittering, checking the web when I  am with them.  So really be present.

  5. Don’t spend my days off just running errands, especially the weekends.  But truly take a Sabbath.

  6. Ultimately, use the time I get back to do two things: 1) use that time to do important, life giving, learning stuff; 2) use that time to be present with my family…not just physically present, but emotionally present.

Give me your thoughts. How would you re-think your time, and what would you do with it?

Our Consumptionist Hunger Has Finally Turned In On Us

Betrayed By Our Consumption
I’ve been thinking about the current economic crisis a lot recently. For the most part of my life I have not followed, or cared too much about business or economic news. For all I knew is that I lived in America and that we were prosperous as a nation and a people (monetarily speaking), and most of us younger generations have not really had to weather any major storms from a national standpoint.

We were never asked to enlist (though many of you did and served honorably…thank you!), or sacrifice our lifestyles for the betterment of the whole nation and other people. We talk a lot about and admire the Greatest Generation for their sacrifices, especially considering that their sacrifices were going to be of the greatest benefit to those who came after them. They were not self-centered, only living in the present, concerned only about their needs.

But we are a very different generation. We have grown up in unheralded prosperity (and yes…if you have a home, have clean drinking water, food to eat…you are prosperous compared to most of the world) and have not had to sacrifice much. This is not to say that no one has made sacrifices, but for the most part we have been able to freely live the lifestyle we want…uninterrupted.

But times are changing and I’m not quite sure what that means for us as a nation and as a people.

Alexander Muse over at the Texas Startup Blog today had a great post, Get ready for mass business failures!

Who is to blame? We are – i.e. you and me. We borrow too much! 43% of us spend more money each year than we make! First, we all spent too much money on houses, cars and consumer goods that we can’t afford. In the 1970s the average size home was 1,400 square feet, today the average is over 2,300 square feet. Are we that much bigger? Today we MUST have a phone, DSL connection, cell phone (maybe two), TIVO, cable TV and so on. All those services come with a monthly recurring cost – a cost we can’t really afford. We are a mess. Of course, lots of us are trying to blame Congress or Wall Street. Sure blame away, but at the end of the day the buck stops with you and me.

Continue Reading…

“Technology as a Powerful Practice”

I believe technology to be a very powerful and important tool for the Church, but as Christians we must also be careful of how and what we embrace in regards to technology. That in the process we don’t become slaves to its means, but rather that we use technology as a transformative and redemptive agent for God’s Kingdom.

Recently I have been having more and more conversations with my friend Wess Daniels, whom I know from Fuller, and who I would on occasion meet up with to grab coffee as we pushed our daughters through Pasadena in their strollers.

Wess is an important and much needed voice in the way of technology and the Church. We are working on developing some online conversations in this area, but in the meantime, please read his article:

Technology as a Powerful Practice (Part 1).

If both the church and technology can be understood as potentially opposing powerful-practices how ought the church interact with technology? The first option is to treat technology as a commodity. We embrace as consumers whatever the latest and greatest gadget is in the name of utility and relevance; utility because it can help bring people in, relevance because irrelevance is the single greatest fear for the church-as-a-people-of commodity. Second, the church can seek to manage technology and keep it under control. The problem with both these options is that they do not recognize the implications of technology as a power and will themselves be reconfigured for the ends necessary of what we could half-jokingly call the imago tech rather than the imago Dei.

The third possibility is avoidance and/or ignorance. In either case this view operates under fallacy that we can remain untouched by “culture” and that maintaining group identity through isolation is the way forward. This is a reversal of the first view. The strength of this position is that it recognizes the power of technology but does not discern technology as an institution. If technology is an institution, a powerful-practice, it is in the air we breathe, we cannot escape its broad-sweep. The final option is to parry technology through participating in it but reorder it under the reign of God. This group acknowledges the universality of technology within the world, but resists its tendencies to reconfigure and dominate life under its particular ends. In one way, you might say this group remains indifferent in their attitude towards technology. They resist through engaging with technology but in a manner that rejects its own end goal and instead joins up with God’s redemptive work within the system.

Tim Keller’s Preaching Notes: How Do You Prepare Your Notes?

I found this link to Tim Keller’s preaching notes here, thanks to a link from DJ Chuang’s site who compared them to something belonging to Jason Bourne.

It’s just fascinating to me to see the many different ways preachers, speakers, teachers, etc. prepare speaking notes. Everyone has their own method that works for them. More recently I have been getting into arranging my talks and teaching ideas around a mind map. I have been using tools like Mind Meister to help me with the process. Thanks to Tony Steward for helping me with this stuff. He is great at mind maps.

It’s amazing for me the connection between therapy, ministry and social media when using mind mapping. Therapy often involves genograms and family systems thinking that is helped by maps and symbols; social media and technology often flows out of ideas that are represented in charts, symbols, graphs….think white boards everywhere. Only makes sense to me that I should carry this creativity over into ministry and move away a bit from the number, bullet point, bullet point, number, bullet point, bullet point method. Know what I mean?

What types of notes do you prepare for preaching, speaking, teaching, etc.? Does it work well for you? Any suggestions for us?

Pastors and Technology: We Need to Re-Imagine Our Roles

Some of the commenters from my post yesterday got me thinking about some things that I just briefly want to comment on.

I ended my post with two thoughts:

Two things I think pastors, church leaders need to start wrestling with if they haven’t already:

1) Shift from geographical based ministry to online community/networking based. This does not mean people still won’t gather, but how, where and when they gather will change.

2) Technology is allowing the people/congregants to self-organize, collaborate and participate without having to go through traditional means and hierarchies of the church. I think this will change the role of the pastor drastically from the top-down leader, to more of a facilitator. I think that means we will see less and less traditional roles of pastors, and maybe even less full-time positions, etc.

Here is what I’m thinking. And I’m thinking these things not on any official research I have done, but more on conversations I am having, trends I am seeing, what I am reading, etc.

One of the issues about #2 is that people are concerned about a “consumer” mentality in the Church…more than we already have now. Also, what will be the role of the pastor.

Couple of thoughts. And they are simply thoughts, not completely worked out, but stuff I am hypothesizing and thinking on.

I think the “modularity” of Church that Andrew Jones talked about won’t drive more church consumerism, but will actually reduce it.

Why?  Because churches used to be the resource for all information (phone numbers, emails, addresses, theology, Christian education, prayer chains, etc.) and churches controlled the market on the ability to gather and organize.  Think Sunday worship, Wed. night Bible studies, etc, etc.  People traditionally have relied on the Church as the resource to gather people and dispense information.

Because of this, people would drive miles and miles to attend the church that could attract, gather and dispense the information for them.  Often this process has pulled people out of community…driving miles and miles to attend a church that is not rooted in their community where they live, etc.

I think that now people can easily organize, collaborate and dispense information themselves, they will no longer need to rely on the Church as needing to fulfill that role.  I think there will be a desire for people to organize and gather in their own communities of locality, rather than feeling the need to drive to churches who used to have to do that for them. I am not saying there will not be church or people won’t go to them. They will, but I think church will look different than it traditionally does now.

In Short: Technology=Ability to Organize and Collaborate=Congregants Taking the Responsibility Into Their Own Hands.

What about the pastor?  I think there will always be the need for a pastor, but what is a pastor is my question?  Have we possibly gotten away from the Biblical role of the pastor?

In the NT we see the correlation between the shepherd and pastor.  I have been told before by some pastors that we are to be ranchers…not shepherds. That has a whole other connotation in my mind.

One commenter said that it’s actually not the pastors who do the shepherding anymore, but the small group leaders, etc. I agree with him. It’s hard to find a pastor who shepherds.

I believe that with the ability to gather, organize and collaborate that technology affords us, it frees up the pastor to do the work of actually shepherding, rather than being the CEO, rancher, etc.  I used the word facilitator in yesterday’s post, and what I mean by that is that the Church is beginning to have the ability to organize on their own, which frees the pastor up to facilitate the movement and truly shepherd the people.

In Short: Technology=Ability to Organize and Collaborate=Congregants Taking the Responsibility Into Their Own Hands=Pastor Can Truly Be a Shepherd.

Of course my own theology and praxis is shining through there, some of which you may agree with, and some which you may not agree with.

But for any of this to take place (which I think is a great thing for the Church), churches, pastors and ministry leaders are going to have to let go of the “power” they have traditionally held, and instead be a church and people that walk humbly amongst the people they are there to serve.  Even questioning their roles as pastors in the Church.

In closing, I’m aware that some traditions/denominations already seem to embody this theology and praxis.  I wonder if Wess Daniels can shed some light on these thoughts in light of the Quaker tradition that he is a part of.

If you are wondering what to read on some of these issues, here are a few suggestions. There are a lot more, but here are some that I have found helpful and challenging. Please add to this list and let me know what you are reading that has been helpful in thinking about the issues of technology in redefining the role of pastors and the Church, especially as it relates to gathering, organizing, collaborating, etc.

Check Them Out

The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations by Ori Brafman and Rod A. Beckstrom.

Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations by Clay Shirky.

Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything by Dan Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams.

Facebook for Pastors: How To Build Relationships And Connect With People Using The Most Popular Social Network On The Internet by Chris Forbes

The New Media Frontier: Blogging, Vlogging and Podcasting for Christ, edited by John Mark Reynolds and Roger Overton

Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies by Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff

Changing Role of the Pastor and Church: From Geography Based to Online Community, and from Top-Down Leader to Facilitator

Mark Brown had an interesting post over at Facebook and on his blog, Ministry in the not too distant future.

Here is what he says:

Seeing this visitor diversity reminded me of the huge shift presently happening in society: moving from relating geographically to relating through networks or interests. This is being driven by the massive growth of the internet. In the not too distant future where you live will mean very little to whom you relate to and the context of your work.

Your workplace may well be wherever you want it to be, your ministry field perhaps on the other side of the world. The most obvious positive is that we potentially can reach huge numbers of people for a fraction of the cost (no travel expenses, venue set up costs etc..) And the negative is that we won’t have as much face to face contact. And for most of us this is the biggest struggle : the idea that we relate without meeting face to face. To quote Hugh Mackay, no longer do we need to be physically present to be in community.

The massive challenge facing us in the church and church organisations is that we are all deeply invested in the geographic model. Parishes are located in suburbs, with autonomous Christian organisations, one to each country. So as this shift away from geography builds momentum we are in for quite a shock.

It is essential that leaders start to wrestle with this otherwise we may well be left wondering where all the people went.. wait isn’t that happening already?

I agree with Mark regarding the essence of his comments here. I think we are seeing a shift away from a geographical based model of church. That is not to say that people will stop gathering at church, but how that looks I think will be very different than the model we see now. I think more and more people will be connected through online networks and gather more locally then drive to church.

I think we will see more and more people connected physically to various networks of ministry, instead of attendance at one church where they participate in everything such as worship, small groups, prayer, etc. It will be more of a modular model that Andrew Jones talked about at GodblogCon.

Two things I think pastors, church leaders need to start wrestling with if they haven’t already:

1) Shift from geographical based ministry to online community/networking based. This does not mean people still won’t gather, but how, where and when they gather will change.

2) Technology is allowing the people/congregants to self-organize, collaborate and participate without having to go through traditional means and hierarchies of the church. I think this will change the role of the pastor drastically from the top-down leader, to more of a facilitator. I think that means we will see less and less traditional roles of pastors, and maybe even less full-time positions, etc.

Thinking out loud. What do you think? Where do you see this already happening?

From 6 Degrees to 3 Degrees of Separation

I’m late to this article, but about a month ago TechCrunch had a great post, Six Degrees of Separation is Now Three.

Couple of things stuck out to me in the article:

According to the study, the average person is now connected by just three degrees within a shared “interest” or social group instead of six. In fact, it found that people are usually a part of three main networks: family, friendship, and work.

and

According to Jeff Rodrigues, a social networking specialist that carried out the study, 97 percent of the participants said they felt more connected to people today than they ever have in the past and for older respondents, email and mobile phones were the key factors in reducing the degrees of separation. But for those in the younger generation, Facebook was the main factor. Text messaging was also mentioned as an important component in reducing degrees of separation.

This is such a fascinating study to me. I have usually found myself to be a pretty good networker and resourceful when it came to connecting with people. But now with my presence on Facebook and Twitter I have found it very easy to bypass the number of connections I used to have to make, and can usually go straight to the source. This has been very helpful in many, many ways, and I love the accessibility that social networking has allowed to many people.

Who knows, maybe 3 Degrees will eventually be outdated.

Wondering how this is changing ministry as well? Have some ideas, but not sure. More of a global village, not separated by geography.

Thoughts?

Fight Club and 8 Rules for Innovation

One of my favorite movies of all time is Fight Club. It’s one of those movies that resonates with so many people on so many different levels. Though in the end, Fight Club proves to be nihilistic, a very different view then I hold as a Christian, it was an amazing movie and has given me much to think about. But that’s for another post entirely.

Brian Clark over at Lateral Action has a great post titled, Tyler Durden’s 8 Rules of Innovation. (HT: Tim Ferriss of 4-Hour Work Week over at his Twitter).

Check out Brian’s full post.

And I apologize ahead of time for some foul language (one word) that is in the linked post. But I definitely recommend reading it. There are some amazing insights on innovation. And some great things we can glean from the post and apply to church and ministry life. I especially like the part on the 80/20 principle which we talk a lot about in church.

Page 2 of 2«12