Archive - July, 2008

Why Twitter? How About California Earthquake To Name One Reason

There are many reasons to Twitter which I have chronicled on this blog.

But today was a perfect example. When the Southern California earthquake hit today at approximately 11:41 (Twitter) or 11:42 (CNN) Twitter was buzzing like crazy. I had numerous reports from numerous sources of the quake almost before it ended.

And when the phone lines wouldn’t work, it was Twitter that allowed my wife and I, as well as other family members and friends connect to make sure everyone was okay.

Great tool. And no matter what complaints people levy against Twitter’s latest technical problems, it’s days like these that make you thankful for Twitter.

UPDATE:

Twitter beats the AP and other new sources by 4-9 minutes
. Gees…how slow is the MSM.

Sort of reminds me of churches, church staffs and denominations that put out “official” news days, weeks and months after everyone else knows about it.

Why aren’t you on Twitter?

Do You Love Your Vision of Christian Community More Than Christian Community Itself?

Just posted this today over at Leadership Network’s Book Blog.

51zbijipoyl_sl500_bo2204203200_pisi
The issues of "leadership" and "community" are huge topics and hot buzzwords in Church today and one only needs to visit a bookstore to peruse the countless book titles in these areas.  Feeling a little overwhelmed I decided to return to a classic book in this area by one of the most amazing theological minds…Life Together by Dietrich Bonhoeffer.  And re-reading this book has reminded me more and more of why I love Bonhoeffer, and the important lessons we can learn from him.  Life Together is Bonhoeffers thoughts and reflections during and about his time at Finkenwalde.

Two things to keep in mind as you continue reading this post:

  1. I read this book on my Amazon Kindle.  This isn’t a post about the Kindle, but I do want to tell you that I love it. It’s an amazing tool.  At this point I only have downloaded the Bible (NIV), Life Together, and Groundswell on it.  I’ve also downloaded some sample books and I have been reading blogs on it.  It’s quite awesome to go anywhere and have so many books on one unit.
  2. Bonhoeffer says some remarkable things, so this post is going to have a couple of very long quotes.  I hope you don’t mind, and I do hope they give you pause for reflection.

One of the more interesting sections of the book is on the topic of community, leadership and "wishful thinking" and it is quite convicting for those of us who are leaders in our Church community, or for those of us who wish our Church was something different than it is.  Bonhoeffer says this about our ideas on community:

On innumerable occasions a whole Christian community has been shattered because it has lived on the basis of a wishful image.  Certainly serious Christians who are put in a community for the first time will often bring with them a very definite image of what Christian communal life [Zusammenleben] should be, and they will be anxious to realize it.  But God’s grace quickly frustrates all such dreams.  A great disillusionment with others, with Christians in general, and, if we are fortunate, with ourselves, is bond to overwhelm us as surely as God desires to lead us to an understanding of genuine Christian community.  By sheer grace God will not permit us to live in a dream world even for a few weeks and to abandon ourselves to those blissful experiences and exalted moods that sweep over us like a wave of rapture.  For God is not a God of emotionalism, but the God of truth.  Only that community which enters into the experience of this great disillusionment with all its unpleasant and evil appearances begins to be in God’s sight, begins to grasp in faith the promise that is given to it.  The sooner this moment of disillusionment comes over the individual and the community, the better for both.  However, a community that cannot bear and cannot survive such disillusionment, clinging instead to its idealized image, when that should be done away with, loses at the same time the promise of a durable Christian community.  Sooner or later it is bound to collapse.

Wow!  I would say we are all guilty of wishing our Church community was something different that it is…at least at times. 

How often do we lose the chance at a durable Christian community, because instead of weathering the ups-downs, trials and foibles of community we instead try to make it something else and it eventually collapses?

Bonhoeffer then goes on to close out his chapter in this section by saying this:

Every human idealized image that is brought into the Christian community is a hindrance to genuine community and must be broken up so that genuine community can survive.  Those who love their dream of a Christian community more than the Christian community itself become destroyers of that Christian community even though their personal intentions may be ever so honest, earnest, and sacrificial. (bold emphasis mine)

As leaders in our Church communities do we love our image of the Christian community more than the Christian community itself?

Have we ever paused to stop and reflect upon whether or not our vision and ideas for the community we lead is actually a hindrance to what God wants to accomplish through those in the community?

There are many books out there on Church community and leadership, but if you could only read one book I would recommend this one.  No one says so much in such a small book as Bonhoeffer.  He will have you stopping on every page and re-reading each section carefully so as not to miss anything, and to be quite sure about what he is saying.

Have you read this book before?  What did you think of it? 

If you haven’t read it before, are you now interested in reading it?  Why?

To Get, or Not To Get an i-Phone?

Before the new i-phone came out I was drooling at any site of, or rumor of it’s impending release.

The days leading up to it and on release day I was glued to TechCrunch’s Twitter just so I wouldn’t miss anything.

But now I’m pretty glad I didn’t rush out to get one. I’m no tech expert, but it seems that first generation i-phone users haven’t had many problems with their phone as they uploaded the new software. But I’ve heard nothing but complaints from most of the people I know about the 2nd Generation phone.

And then Terry Storch who I respect decided to take his back.

So we will see what happens. I still want one, but I’m not in as big a rush anymore. In regards to my post, I don’t want to become a slave to the i-phone, and I think I was getting close.

My former co-worker and good friend Matt Singley has a humorous vlog about his new i-phone. Check it out below:

Technology and Humanity

I love this quote by Daniel Kantor over at Collide Magazine in the article How Expensive Technology Can Cheapen Us.

I think when the technology becomes not only the focal point but the prerequisite, we’ve cheapened not only the art, but our humanity. I’m not against technology. My design firm is filled with high-end technical equipment. But we first practice the fundamental craft of design. We think about things like composition, scale, balance, rhythm, contrast, hospitality, flow. It takes years to learn to master these elements. Technology often presents us with the illusion that you need not think about these things. Yet nothing could be further from the truth if you want your efforts to express something of the human experience. I’m a big fan of technology in service of humanity. It’s the reverse that cheapens us.

That probably seems obvious enough, but I think it can be very difficult with our obsession with all the technology now available. I’ve been reminded a lot of this issue as I read more and more that technology is only as good as when we think about people first.

Question: Do you have one piece of technology that rather than it being of service to you, you tend to be in service to it?

Laptop?

Cell phone?

Thinking Out Loud: Making Disciples in an Age of Information Extraction

Caution: Thinking out loud as the title says, so a bit of a choppy post. But I’m curious of your thoughts.

It is often true that we look back at how we did something as being the only way something can be done. For example, if I took all these classes (Greek, Hebrew, exegetics, etc.) in seminary, then every student should take them to get that Master of Divinity. Or if ordination required A, B, and C, then I have to do A, B, and C as well. But often, we don’t re-evaluate how things are changing, and what things need to change along with them.

I’ve been thinking about this issue for several reasons, but primarily because I think the Church, and most often ministry gets caught in a pattern of doing things the way they have always been done, and fails to be innovative in its thinking. Don’t get me wrong though, many Churches are innovative in ways that need to be innovative, and not just for the sake of it.

So my thinking out loud concerns the amount of information now available to us online, and will continue to become available online. How will that change how we do things?

Last month Wired Magazine ran an incredible series of articles called The Petabyte Age: Because More Isn’t Just More–More Is Different. In this series one of the articles was The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete, and it begins with this:

Sixty years ago, digital computers made information readable. Twenty years ago, the Internet made it reachable. Ten years ago, the first search engine crawlers made it a single database. Now Google and like-minded companies are sifting through the most measured age in history, treating this massive corpus as a laboratory of the human condition. They are the children of the Petabyte Age.

The Petabyte Age is different because more is different. Kilobytes were stored on floppy disks. Megabytes were stored on hard disks. Terabytes were stored in disk arrays. Petabytes are stored in the cloud. As we moved along that progression, we went from the folder analogy to the file cabinet analogy to the library analogy to — well, at petabytes we ran out of organizational analogies.

At the petabyte scale, information is not a matter of simple three- and four-dimensional taxonomy and order but of dimensionally agnostic statistics. It calls for an entirely different approach, one that requires us to lose the tether of data as something that can be visualized in its totality. It forces us to view data mathematically first and establish a context for it later. For instance, Google conquered the advertising world with nothing more than applied mathematics. It didn’t pretend to know anything about the culture and conventions of advertising — it just assumed that better data, with better analytical tools, would win the day. And Google was right.

And thanks to Guy Kawasaki I came across this article World’s Oldest Bible Goes Online. This is just another classic example of what was not available to us before will now be online. Think how information like this will change seminary education, pastoring, Church life, etc. as it becomes more available online.

Ever been sitting there, late at night, thinking, “Gee, I’d like to find a good Bible quote, but how do I know if it’s been accurately translated?” Well, you’re in luck! Portions of the Codex Sinaiticus, dating from 350 and thought to have been written by early Egyptian Christians, will be available on the internet courtesy of the Russian National Library, British Library and St. Catherine’s monastery in its entirety by July of next year. The oldest complete version of the New Testament, the original text may baffle those unfamiliar with ancient Greek, but translations in English and German will also be made available. “A manuscript is going onto the net which is like nothing else online to date…It’s also an enrichment of the virtual world — and a bit of a change from YouTube,” commented the director of the Leipzig University Library.

So what does all this available information mean to us as pastors and leaders in the 21st Century?

A few months ago I wrote a post called The Changing Seminary–The Changing Pastor where Scott McClellan of Collide Magazine
interviews Craig Detweiler in the article Culture and Seminary. Here is a brief exchange:

Detweiler: No, that’s the right question. Seminaries were created in an era where ministers were prepared to have the most information. The ministers were supposed to be the most educated and the most informed about the Scriptures.

COLLIDE: The most literate maybe?

Detweiler: The most literate. And none of that has necessarily changed, but we’re now dealing with an age of too much information. And so, the job is to help people sort through all of the inputs to find out what matters amongst the avalanche of information. It’s about pointing people to reliable sources, pointing people to credible interpretations, inviting people into ongoing dialogue with their friends, neighbors, and coworkers around the pop cultural expressions. So, it’s moving the seminary education from pastor as most informed to pastor as most insightful because people no longer have an information problem. It’s not about lack of information. It’s about lack of discernment. Information is available to all. Wisdom and discernment remain rarer than ever.

Observation: As more and more information becomes available online we will need more and more discerning Christian leaders who can sift through all the information and apply/teach/preach it appropriately. But it seems to me that the Bible is not just information, or should not be reduced to that. I remember my Greek professor telling me that it’s not enough to simply know the meaning of a Greek word (caution to everyone who looks up the meaning online and assumes that’s how it is used in the NT), but one must understand the context of the word in that letter, how the author uses, it, etc, etc.

Question: So how do we cultivate discerning Christian leaders to not simply extract information, but grow disciples in such an age?

POST: Re-Structuring and Moving Collective Muse

We define the four-step POST process for creating strategies–people, objectives, strategy, and technology–and reveal why starting with the technologies is a mistake.

That is the advice I wish I would have read 6 months ago as I was thinking about creating the college ministry network Collective Muse.

I came across it in the must read book Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies by Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff.

In it they have developed the acronym POST which stands for the following:

P=People
O=Objectives
S=Strategy
T=Technology

When creating strategies for social media this is the process they recommend. Most of us think about the technology first, rather than thinking about the people who may use it. At least I do that. Hopefully not any more though.

But to create a community one was must think about the people first, and what objectives and strategies will help you accomplish your goal. Will your people create content, or do they prefer to respond? Do they respond, or do they just like to read? Lots of things to think about. I just thought about technology because I love college ministry and wanted to gather college leaders from around the country…not taking into consideration if it was/is the right tool for them, and whether or not there is something already available for them.

With that in mind I also realized through reading this book that fostering online community takes time, of which I don’t have tons of with two jobs, a family and lots of interests.

So I have decided to move Collective Muse to a Christian site that is built around gathering people around their passions…ROOV. What is ROOV? ROOV is:

Roov.com is an online community that connects like-minded individuals around shared experiences and passions within their church and cities.

You can now find Collective Muse on ROOV by going to ROOV and searching for Collective Muse, or clicking on this link when you are logged in.

I hope by moving Collective Muse to ROOV several things can be accomplished:

  1. I don’t have to be responsible for maintaining a whole network (coding, providing content, fixing bugs, etc.)

  2. The network doesn’t revolve around me, but is decentralized on an already existing site. I will still have to work part of this out though as I created Collective Muse on ROOV. But for now, I suggest people just add Collective Muse as a friend and we begin to gather around our passions related to college ministry.

  3. You will find lots of people interested in college ministry who never would have joined Collective Muse, and you will find other things you are passionate about.

  4. We are joining a new and exciting network (ROOV) which is devoted to gathering Christians around their passions, and moving them towards action. So it’s a good base to start with.

  5. By being a part of ROOV, hopefully it will be more than a group that people simply join because they are interested, but that our interests and passions drive us towards actions, and opportunities to gather.

Last, I know that there are many groups that you can join, and that by doing so takes time that you sometimes don’t have. So I apologize for moving Collective Muse off a Ning, a site which you spent time joining, but I appreciate your interest, and I know that in the long run that making this move is much smarter than staying on a site that is not very active.

Sometimes we so much want to create something new, but often there are already tools and sites that exist. And so sometimes it’s better to join those that are already doing a great work. ROOV is doing a great work and has a lot of potential. So those of us who love college ministry I hope we can gather around Collective Muse on ROOV as well as others who are passionate about this topic.

And hopefully, the more I do this, the better I get at it, and the less mistakes I make.

Anyone Want To Buy My Car???

I’m trying to sell my car before I head to Dallas. Anyone interested.

2002 VW Passat 4–1.8 Liter Turbo

“The only way to change culture is to make more culture.” Agree or Disagree?

Andy Crouch on culture and his new book, Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling.

Following Donald Miller…

Donald Miller is by far one of my favorite authors. Blue Like Jazz changed my thinking radically, and what I want in a good book. You can read here about the night we had him out to speak to our college ministry.

Recently I have been following him on Twitter and am impressed with his Ride: Well Bike Tour, raising money for blood: water mission.

Check out the video:

Short Term Missions: Coupling Education and Service

This last March I led a team of 7 of us to Mexico City where we served with two of our partners Amextra and Partners in Hope. This was the second time that I took a team on this trip, and in all of my experiences in mission trips this has stood out as the most impactful for those who went. You can read about my previous post on this type of trip at A Different Kind of Mission Trip.

Here’s a blurb about these two partners that work together:

Partners in Hope

We facilitate transformation through an intense immersion experience in Mexico, called the PiH Seminar. The PiH Seminar includes 5-10 days of living in Mexico City, one of the largest cities in the world, a city, where chaos, poverty and injustice abound. Through the Seminar, participants experience first-hand the lives of people, the work of Christ- centered organizations who serve among the poor, and the hope that God brings through transformation.

Amextra

The Mexican Association for Rural and Urban Transformation, has offered continuous service to marginalized communities in Mexico throughout the last 21 years. We have been present in 11 of 32 states, in 300 different communities. We have accompanied more than 75,000 people in holistic transformation processes, with the support of more than 800 promoters.

There are a couple of unique things that have made this trip different than other ones:

  1. We live in a Quaker hostel in Mexico City.
  2. The trip is designed around seminars.
  3. The trip is part service, part education.
  4. The students are exposed to a variety of views (theological, political, economical, etc.)

I have been on no other mission trip that has been so disorienting in such an amazing way for students. They come back to their homes with a completely different outlook on the world, God, etc.

This is just an example of how trips can be different. We based this trip heavily on education, coupled with service. The goal is that the educational piece will really give great depth to the service, therefore causing a deeper transformation of their thought and practice.

What are the key components of a great, transformational mission trip? Give an example of what you have done?

Page 1 of 3123»