Archive - February, 2006

Being Authentic: Service

Last week, Chris briefly explored some issues regarding the authenticity of pastors, and how much vulnerability and transparency should a pastor, preacher, teacher employ….not only in the proclamation of the Word, but pastorally in the ministry.

This is a really good topic and I have been thinking about this issue a lot over the weekend. And one of the aspects that I think makes not only pastors, but Christians more authentic, and puts them in a place of vulnerability with one another, is in the area of service.

What do I mean by that? When we serve one another, and how we serve one another puts us in the ultimate place of authenticity, vulnerabilty and humility. We don’t all serve with the right motives, but when we do serve we are deciding to put someone else’s interests…the ministry, the community, the person…ahead of us. In the Christ hymn of Philippians 2:5-11, we are given a beautiful portrait of Christ, who serves us, by humbling Himself, not only in taking the form of a man, but of also suffering with us, and ultimately dying the death of crucifixion. That is authenticity….that is vulnerabillity…that is transparency….and those things come in the act of service…of humbling and submitting ourselves to one another and to Jesus Christ.

How does this play out in the role of ministry? I came across this quote today at my friend Don Coleman’s site. On his post he quotes Lesslie Newbigin as saying:

A minister does not, cease to be a layman when he is ordained

I have been thinking about that statement. And it seems to me that pastors become aloof and inauthentic, most often when they remove themselves from serving others…whether it be individuals, congregations, etc. Sometimes I am given reasons for ordination that have nothing to do with serving Christ or others, but rather are about the perks of ordination, whether it be the healthcare, the salary increase, etc, etc. And I see in all of this a temptation for pastors to move beyond serving one another, and to serving over others, so that others will do the serving. Now understand me here. I’m not saying pastors don’t oversee others, or help empower others to serve. But if pastors eventually remove themselves from serving alongside with laypeople, and doing the tasks of laypeople, then I think we become inauthentic. No longer vulnerable..no longer transparent. We separate ourselves from the congregation and those within it, putting up one wall after another they have to navigate around to have access to us. Or we put one layer after layer of communication in front of us, so that them to actually talk to me via phone, email, or face to face, is quite the task.

I picture it this way: When I was young, growing up in a small church we would have church potlucks. Someone had to put the tables and chairs out. Someone had to prepare the food. Someone had to clean up. And most often, I remember in this small church, and in other small churches seeing the pastors and leaders doing the work, or helping out with the work, alongside the laypeople. There was no distinction…clergy and lay, serving alongside one another. But somewhere along the way as we get more and more prestige or power or responsibility we pass “those tasks” on to lay people. This is not about handing over responsibilties to others who want to serve. But this about the unwillingess of pastors and clergy to pitch in and do the work that needs to be done, alongside those you preach to. Those you preach to, you should not only serve with your words, but with your actions.

If we see ourselves as pastors, directors, etc., unwilling to pitch in and do the work that others do, and to serve them. Metaphorically speaking and literally speaking….when we no longer help set up chairs and take them down, or stop and help fold a bulletin if needed…or run some copies for ourselves….then I think we lose our authenticity…our realness….our vulnerability…our transparency…our humility……pick a word.

If you want to be a pastor or director that is authentically real with those you speak to, then you don’t need to manufacture that. That comes with serving those you preach to. Serving in and amongst them, rather than serving over them.

Technorati Tags: , ,

There is some great weekend reading out there, so let me suggest some.

1. Tyler Williams has put together a couple of movie lists for theologians. The first is the Essential Films for Theologians: “The Director’s Cut”, followed by the Essential Films of 2005 for Theologians. He has putten together a really beautiful list of films, some of which I have, and haven’t seen. I noticed several that I have waiting for me at Netflix.

2. Here is a great post about Donald Miller by Joe Thorn titled, Mark Coppenger and Blue Like Jazz. This post by Joe was in response to a lecture given by Mark Coppenger at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary about Blue Like Jazz by Don Miller. HT: Brent Thomas and Steve McKoy. I brought Donald Miller out to our college group in October of 2005, and it was one of the best things we have done. He thoughts really resonated with my students, and those who drove from all over CA to come see him speak. I love this quote from Thorn:

Mark did make a good point early on. He said that in the book Don was being “real” (little r) which is easier than being “Real” (big R) meaning pointing beyond human experience to The Truth. I think that can be a helpful thing to discuss, and of course I agree with the premise. But I think the reason so many were intrigued with Miller’s realness (little r) is because the church has been very good at pumping out the Real while not being very real.

I think the church sometimes has not been very good at realness (little r), and my students appreciated Miller’s realness with them. They didn’t all agree with him, whether it was his views on politics, economics, Jesus Christ, Christianity, etc…but they at least felt he was being honest and real…and passionate.

3. Peter Leithart has strung some interesting and informative views on modernism, postmodernism, etc, etc. Check it out. HT: Smart Christian

4. Ben Myers has a post on a topic I have yet to see before, and that is Essential Building for Theologians

5. Chris Gonzalez has a great post on Confessions of a Pastor. This is a discussion II would like to pick up sometime next week with Chris and any others. I responded to Chris with some comments, but I want to explore this issue more. I think that we live in a different time, and preaching has changed. No longer do many pastors, at least of my generation, stand behind a pulpit. Maybe a music lectern. And if they aren’t authentic and real with their congregation, then they’ve lost their congregation. Chris and I might be different on this issue since we work primarily as college pastors. College students require an authenticity that is nothing like I have seen before.

I don’t think it is something that we can manufacture or teach. Maybe we can grow into it. And it is probably cyclical…sometimes we are authentic, other times we are not. I don’t preach from behind a pulpit, and I don’t stand on a stage in hopes of placing myself within my college students, and not above them. Though I am their leader, I believe in leading from within, than from above or from outside. This is a concept Henri Nouwen draws out in, In The Name of Jesus: Reflections on Christian Leadership, which is the best book on Christian leadership out there, and required reading for all of my leaders.

Also, there is a difference between being authentic and vulnerable with your congregation, and bleeding on them. We are required I believe to be authentic and real…struggles and all. But it is not to be a time where we put ourselves on the counseling couch for 50 minutes in front of everyone. Some things should be shared, and others should remain private.

Okay…we can pick up on this later. But I think this issue is huge, and one of the biggest factors in how people choose churches and it is growing to be a growing issue as the “younger” generation is thirsting for this.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Help?

Does anyone know how to filter out Trackbacks, or are they just part of the deal if you blog. I’ve just been noticing all the ones on posts from casinos and porn sites, etc…since I said porn in this entry means I will probably have 100′s of trackbacks on this site from porn companies.

Is it best to just shutdown all trackbacks, or just limit them to one’s that come from certain blogs?

So any suggestions on how to cut that stuff out, or down…and how to even filter out spam commenters already more than I am…I am open to suggestions and thoughts.

Christian marketing…Creativity…And how far is too far?

We are all guilty in the evangelical community of often “ripping off” or “emulating” logos or ideas that we see in the greater culture around us. I am the first to admit that we “emulate” MTV’s Cribs for our college ministry as we go to different student’s apartments and film an episode in an effort to have some fun and connect each other to our greater community.

Some churches do branding campaigns…..

others…

T-shirt designs rip off looks of main-stream brands…

I was guilty of wearing this shirt in high school to the gym,
shirt.jpg

We even had a friend design our college ministry logo,

quest%201.jpg

Then I received this story from my brother-in-law this morning,

Church steals XBOX 360 trademark to lure new new members

church_flyer_front.jpg

I think we are all guilty of it at some level and to some degree….but does anyone have any thoughts on this topic of Christian marketing, and the use, or emulating of cultural logos or themes, in order to “sell” and “promote” the gospel.

Does the Christian community lack creativity and originality? I don’t think so.

Maybe the very creative get forced outside of the Christian “bubble” because of their free thinking and expression.

Is the non-Christian market just much more creative?

I have a friend who at one point in his life was playing the Charlie Brown theme after church on the piano. And the pastor’s wife came up to him and told him that he was not allowed to play such music in church. That that was not Christian, and was music from Satan. So this musically gifted little kid took his creativity outside of the church. He was not sure how to reconcile what he believed was a talent and gift from God, and the inability to express it in the church.

I’m sure this story is repeated lots of times. I wonder if this scenario forces many to take residence up outside of the often stifling structures of the church.

Shifting from the West…Global Christianity

Evangelical Christianity Shifting Outside West
HT: Smart Christian

Interesting article about how Evangelicalism, which was “born in England and nurtured in the United States, is leaving home.”

For a longer treatment of this issue, read the book, The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity by Philip Jenkins.

jenkins.jpg

Technorati Tags: ,

Some interesting posts….

Drew Sams has got a review and some thoughts on the book, A Churchless Faith by Alan Jamieson. The steps and turning points that Drew outlines are interesting and worth a read.

Steve McCoy at reformissionary has a very interesting story about a ministry that exists in a local church that you don’t see too often.

Ryan Bolger has a string of several posts summarizing some of his thoughts during the two-week intensive he and Eddie Gibbs taught at Fuller on “the emerging church”.

Eric Jacobsen has an interesting piece on urbanism, and an interesting description of what is called the orange juice test.

Concluding Postcript and Some Recommendations….

In regards to allowing God to be God, and how we speak of God and His actions, and how that impacts our thinking, teaching, preaching, conversations, etc…I defer to two of the greatest theologians of all time.

Barth 1.jpg
Karl Barth says this in Doctrine of the Word of God: Prolegomena to Church Dogmatics I/I:

Volume 1/1: The Word of God
A. On the relation of dogmatics to proclamation (pp, 85-87)
(underlinings are my emphasis)

3. The theme of Church proclamation or subject-matter of Christianity demands dogmatics to the extent that its proclamation is a responsible act and to the extent that dogmatics is the effort to meet this responsibility towards the theme of proclamation. Yet it is by no means the case that in dogmatics the Church becomes as it were the lord and judge of the subject-matter, so that the current results of dogmatics are to be accepted as law imposed as it were on God, revelation and faith. Dogmatics has to investigate and say at each given point how we may best speak of God, revelation and faith to the extent that human talk about these things is to count as Church proclamation. It should not think that it can lay down what God, revelation and faith are in themselves. In both its investigations and its conclusions it must keep in view that God is in heaven and it on earth, and that God, His revelation and faith always live their own free life over against all human talk, including that of the best dogmatics. Even if we have again weighed everything and corrected everything and formulated everything better, as is our duty to the subject-matter of Christianity in respect of human talk about it, and even if our findings have been given the status of Church confession and dogma, we have still to say: We are unprofitable servants, and in no sense are we to imagine that we have become in the very least masters of the subject.

Like the subject-matter of Christianity, Church proclamation must also remain free in the last resort, free to receive the command which it must always receive afresh from that free life of the subject-matter of Christianity. Church proclamation and not dogmatics is immediate to God in the Church. Proclamation is essential, dogmatics is needed only for the sake of it. Dogmatics lives by it to the extent that it lives only in the Church. In proclamation, and in God, revelation and faith only to the degree that these are its objects, dogmatics is to seek its material.

bonhoeffer-standing.jpg
Dietrich Bonhoeffer says this in Spiritual Care:

The greatest difficulty for the pastor stems from his theology. He knows all there is to be known about sin and forgiveness….The peak of theological craftiness is to conceal necessary and wholesome unrest under such self-justification….The conscience has been put to sleep. Theology becomes a science by which one learns to excuse everything and justify everything….The theologian knows that he cannot be shot out of the saddle by other theologians. Everything his theology admits is justified. This is the curse of theology. (Spiritual Care pp.67-68)

As for some book recommendations that I think are absolutely brilliant regarding the issues of suffering, and even the issue of cancer are the following:

observed.jpg
A Grief Observed by C. S. Lewis

This is Lewis’s honest account of what he experienced at the loss of his wife to breast cancer. A beautiful look and insight in the journal writings of man who is devastated by the loss, and who moves from doubt to a more affirmed faith in God through the journey of grief.

consolation.jpg
A Letter of Consolation by Henri Nouwen

A beautiful letter that Henri Nouwen wrote to his father six months after the death of his mother. Beautiful exploration of grief and suffering and the beauty of resurrection out of death.

moltmann.jpg
The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ As the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology by Jurgen Moltmann

Maybe one of the most signficant theological works written that explores the suffering on the cross as the beginning point of our theology.

A strange new world…

eerie.gif

China’s new virtual police

Cool reads for the weekend….

Women’s U.S. Snowboarder Kelly Clark on her Christian faith. And if you wonder what music is going through her headphones during her competition, it is David Crowder’s “Oh Praise Him.”

Andrew Jones post some thoughts on the hierarchal nature of the blogosphere, and has some questions about that in relation to the Godhead.

Wow! I am obsessed with LOST, but I am not ,this smart.

Reading my Bible…confession.

As you know, if you have been reading this blog as of late…I have been challenging my students, myself, and everyone to read through the Bible this year. And I have definitely experienced my ups and downs. Some weeks it’s a no brainer and almost an unconscious habit, where my day just doesn’t seem right if it isn’t started in the Word. Other days, I am struggling to get out of bed, and then struggling to make reading the Word the first thing I do in the morning.

But that seems pretty typical of the spiritual life….Ups and Downs, Mountains and Valleys. Some weeks everything is going right, and other weeks, it feels like all the wheels are coming off the wagon.

One of the things that reading the Bible from front to cover does, is raise a lot of questions. Old questions are being renewed, and I now have some new ones. Over the next few months, and along the way I wan to address or at least bring up some of these question, whether I think there are answers for them or not.

But during our Mammoth ski retreat this weekend, I think I had more questions posed to me than ever before. And they all seemed to be a result of this journey of reading through the Bible in a year. Hence, all of their questions, or most of them, are based on their readings in the Torah (Gen, Ex., Lev., Numb., Deut.).

That’s for sure. If you read through the Law/Torah, and you have no questions, thoughts, answers, etc…than I am wondering if you are even reading it.

So I will be posting some of these questions along the way, and I hope to get some feedback from some of you.

Page 1 of 3123»